Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1306387 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-11 16:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-01-11 16:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cgroup tree with the tip tree Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-01-11 16:20 +0100
| From | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 16:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cgroup tree with the tip tree |
| Message-ID | <qPMqe-46s-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
* Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 03:41:19PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Tejun,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the cgroup tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > init/Kconfig
> >
> > between commits:
> >
> > 257372262056 ("x86/intel_rdt: Add support for Cache Allocation detection")
> > 5ad9144cdb9a ("x86,cgroup/intel_rdt : Add a cgroup interface to manage Intel cache allocation")
>
> Ingo, can you please revert the rdt cgroup. I still don't think this
> is the right approach and tglx's new proposal seems a lot better.
>
> Thanks.
Ok, it's all zapped.
Thanks,
Ingo
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web