Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1305047 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-09 00:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-01-12 13:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [RFC][PATCH] ppc: Implement save_stack_trace_regs() Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-01-09 00:00 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] ppc: Implement save_stack_trace_regs() Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2016-01-11 04:40 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] ppc: Implement save_stack_trace_regs() Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-01-11 16:00 +0100
Re: powerpc: Implement save_stack_trace_regs() to enable kprobe stack tracing (was [RFC] ppc: Implement save_stack_trace_regs()) Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2016-01-12 13:40 +0100
| From | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-09 00:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH] ppc: Implement save_stack_trace_regs() |
| Message-ID | <qOOaJ-4WG-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:24:19 -0500 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote: > On Wed, 09 Dec 2015 12:03:05 +1100 > Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote: > > > > > Should I take this via powerpc or do you want it to go in via tracing? > > > > > > You can take it. And you can replace the PT_R1 if you want. I just > > > noticed that it was defined, and I try to use macro names instead of > > > hard coded numbers. I was actually looking for a "PT_SP" :-) > > > > OK thanks. > > > > Looks like we actually have: > > > > #define kernel_stack_pointer(regs) ((regs)->gpr[1]) > > > > So that would be the most self documenting way to do it I guess, though I've > > never actually seen that macro used anywhere before :) > > Hi, > > Are you going to take this, or do you want me to? > > -- Steve Ping? -- Steve
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 04:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qPBuO-58D-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1305047 |
On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 17:50 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:24:19 -0500
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 09 Dec 2015 12:03:05 +1100
> > Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
> > > > > Should I take this via powerpc or do you want it to go in via tracing?
> > > >
> > > > You can take it. And you can replace the PT_R1 if you want. I just
> > > > noticed that it was defined, and I try to use macro names instead of
> > > > hard coded numbers. I was actually looking for a "PT_SP" :-)
> > >
> > > OK thanks.
> > >
> > > Looks like we actually have:
> > >
> > > #define kernel_stack_pointer(regs) ((regs)->gpr[1])
> > >
> > > So that would be the most self documenting way to do it I guess, though I've
> > > never actually seen that macro used anywhere before :)
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Are you going to take this, or do you want me to?
Sorry, yep I'll take it.
I trimmed the change log a bit, final version below.
cheers
powerpc: Implement save_stack_trace_regs() to enable kprobe stack tracing
It has come to my attention that kprobe event stack tracing does not
work on powerpc. You can see with the following:
# cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing
# echo stacktrace > trace_options
# echo 'p kfree' > kprobe_events
# echo 1 > events/kprobes/enable
Will print the following warning:
save_stack_trace_regs() not implemented yet.
Although save_stack_trace() (which normal event stack traces use) is
implemented, save_stack_trace_regs() which kprobe events use is not.
This is a cheap attempt to implement that function.
Note, This may have issues if a task tries to get a stack trace from
another task with its regs, because it just passes in "current" to
save_context_stack(). But this does solve the issue with stack tracing
kprobe events.
Reported-by: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c
index ea43a347a104..4f24606afc3f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -61,3 +61,10 @@ void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stack_trace *trace)
save_context_stack(trace, tsk->thread.ksp, tsk, 0);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(save_stack_trace_tsk);
+
+void
+save_stack_trace_regs(struct pt_regs *regs, struct stack_trace *trace)
+{
+ save_context_stack(trace, regs->gpr[1], current, 0);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(save_stack_trace_regs);
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 16:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qPM6S-3KB-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1305802 |
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 14:30:31 +1100 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote: > Sorry, yep I'll take it. > > I trimmed the change log a bit, final version below. > > cheers > Thanks, appreciate it! -- Steve
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-12 13:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: powerpc: Implement save_stack_trace_regs() to enable kprobe stack tracing (was [RFC] ppc: Implement save_stack_trace_regs()) |
| Message-ID | <qQ6oX-Sx-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1305802 |
On Mon, 2016-11-01 at 03:30:31 UTC, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 17:50 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > Are you going to take this, or do you want me to? > > Sorry, yep I'll take it. > > I trimmed the change log a bit, final version below. > > powerpc: Implement save_stack_trace_regs() to enable kprobe stack tracing > > It has come to my attention that kprobe event stack tracing does not > work on powerpc. You can see with the following: > > # cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing > # echo stacktrace > trace_options > # echo 'p kfree' > kprobe_events > # echo 1 > events/kprobes/enable > > Will print the following warning: > save_stack_trace_regs() not implemented yet. > > Although save_stack_trace() (which normal event stack traces use) is > implemented, save_stack_trace_regs() which kprobe events use is not. > This is a cheap attempt to implement that function. > > Note, This may have issues if a task tries to get a stack trace from > another task with its regs, because it just passes in "current" to > save_context_stack(). But this does solve the issue with stack tracing > kprobe events. > > Reported-by: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Applied to powerpc next, thanks. https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/35de3b1aa16842214e0cd7c603 cheers
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web