Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1303721 > unrolled thread

Re: [BUG] perf test 21("Test object code reading") failure on ARM64

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [BUG] perf test 21("Test object code reading") failure on ARM64 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-01-07 17:30 +0100
    Re: [BUG] perf test 21("Test object code reading") failure on ARM64 Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> - 2016-01-08 09:10 +0100
      Re: [BUG] perf test 21("Test object code reading") failure on ARM64 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-01-08 14:00 +0100

#1303721 — Re: [BUG] perf test 21("Test object code reading") failure on ARM64

Em Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:18:20AM +0800, xiakaixu escreveu:
> 于 2015/12/20 8:25, Jan Stancek 写道:
> > On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 11:04:21AM +0800, xiakaixu wrote:
> >>
> >>>>>    ...
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> What is your objdump version?
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Sorry for the late reply.
> >>
> >> # objdump --version
> >> GNU objdump (GNU Binutils) 2.25.
> >>
> >> I am sure that the system is Little endian.
> >>>
> > 
> > I have attached a patch if you care to try it with your setup.
> > If it still fails, output from -v and last objdump command output
> > would be helpful.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> After applying this patch, the perf test case passed.
> 
> # perf test 21
> 21: Test object code reading                                 : (no vmlinux) Ok

So, assuming this doesn't break other running the test in other arches,
can Jan please resend this with a changelog and a Tested-by: Xia?

Was that done already? /me still digging thru my queue after last month
vacations...

- Arnaldo
 
> Thanks!
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Jan
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards
> Kaixu Xia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1304246

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>
> To: "xiakaixu" <xiakaixu@huawei.com>
> Cc: "Jan Stancek" <jstancek@redhat.com>, "Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@redhat.com>, "adrian hunter" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
> "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>, "masami hiramatsu pt" <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com>
> Sent: Thursday, 7 January, 2016 5:27:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [BUG] perf test 21("Test object code reading") failure on ARM64
> 
> Em Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:18:20AM +0800, xiakaixu escreveu:
> > 于 2015/12/20 8:25, Jan Stancek 写道:
> > > On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 11:04:21AM +0800, xiakaixu wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>>>    ...
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> What is your objdump version?
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> Sorry for the late reply.
> > >>
> > >> # objdump --version
> > >> GNU objdump (GNU Binutils) 2.25.
> > >>
> > >> I am sure that the system is Little endian.
> > >>>
> > > 
> > > I have attached a patch if you care to try it with your setup.
> > > If it still fails, output from -v and last objdump command output
> > > would be helpful.
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > After applying this patch, the perf test case passed.
> > 
> > # perf test 21
> > 21: Test object code reading                                 : (no vmlinux)
> > Ok
> 
> So, assuming this doesn't break other running the test in other arches,
> can Jan please resend this with a changelog and a Tested-by: Xia?
> 
> Was that done already? /me still digging thru my queue after last month
> vacations...

Hi,

not yet. I'd like to try the patch also on ppc64 BE/LE before I post it
(likely next week).

Regards,
Jan

> 
> - Arnaldo
>  
> > Thanks!
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Jan
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > Regards
> > Kaixu Xia
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1304507

Em Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 03:03:34AM -0500, Jan Stancek escreveu:
> > From: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>
> > Em Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:18:20AM +0800, xiakaixu escreveu:
> > > After applying this patch, the perf test case passed.

> > > # perf test 21
> > > 21: Test object code reading    : (no vmlinux)
> > > Ok

> > So, assuming this doesn't break other running the test in other arches,
> > can Jan please resend this with a changelog and a Tested-by: Xia?

> > Was that done already? /me still digging thru my queue after last month
> > vacations...
 
> not yet. I'd like to try the patch also on ppc64 BE/LE before I post it
> (likely next week).

Thanks, I'll wait then,

- Arnaldo

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web