Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1302807 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] clocksource/vt8500: Fix hangs in small delays

Started byDaniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
First post2016-01-06 15:30 +0100
Last post2016-01-07 11:50 +0100
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] clocksource/vt8500: Fix hangs in small delays Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2016-01-06 15:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] clocksource/vt8500: Fix hangs in small delays Roman Volkov <v1ron@mail.ru> - 2016-01-06 16:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] clocksource/vt8500: Fix hangs in small delays Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2016-01-07 11:50 +0100

#1302807 — Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] clocksource/vt8500: Fix hangs in small delays

FromDaniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Date2016-01-06 15:30 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 0/3] clocksource/vt8500: Fix hangs in small delays
Message-ID<qNXg6-2iB-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 01/01/2016 02:24 PM, Roman Volkov wrote:
> From: Roman Volkov <rvolkov@v1ros.org>
>
> vt8500 hangs in nanosleep() function, starting from commit
> c6eb3f70d4482806dc2d3e1e3c7736f497b1d418, making the system unusable.
> Per investigation, looks like set_next_event() now receives too small
> delta and fails with -ETIME.


Hi Roman,

I think the patch 1/3 should go as a fix for 4.4-rc7 and stable and the 
two other should go for the next version as they are improvements 
regarding the current code.

-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1302859

FromRoman Volkov <v1ron@mail.ru>
Date2016-01-06 16:40 +0100
Message-ID<qNYlQ-326-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1302807
В Wed, 6 Jan 2016 15:24:07 +0100
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> пишет:

> On 01/01/2016 02:24 PM, Roman Volkov wrote:
> > From: Roman Volkov <rvolkov@v1ros.org>
> >
> > vt8500 hangs in nanosleep() function, starting from commit
> > c6eb3f70d4482806dc2d3e1e3c7736f497b1d418, making the system
> > unusable. Per investigation, looks like set_next_event() now
> > receives too small delta and fails with -ETIME.  
> 
> 
> Hi Roman,
> 
> I think the patch 1/3 should go as a fix for 4.4-rc7 and stable and
> the two other should go for the next version as they are improvements 
> regarding the current code.
> 

Hi Daniel,

I agree, -stable can live without the patches 2 an 3.

Regards,
Roman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1303475

FromDaniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Date2016-01-07 11:50 +0100
Message-ID<qOgiK-6Tx-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1302859
On 01/06/2016 04:30 PM, Roman Volkov wrote:
> В Wed, 6 Jan 2016 15:24:07 +0100
> Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> пишет:
>
>> On 01/01/2016 02:24 PM, Roman Volkov wrote:
>>> From: Roman Volkov <rvolkov@v1ros.org>
>>>
>>> vt8500 hangs in nanosleep() function, starting from commit
>>> c6eb3f70d4482806dc2d3e1e3c7736f497b1d418, making the system
>>> unusable. Per investigation, looks like set_next_event() now
>>> receives too small delta and fails with -ETIME.
>>
>>
>> Hi Roman,
>>
>> I think the patch 1/3 should go as a fix for 4.4-rc7 and stable and
>> the two other should go for the next version as they are improvements
>> regarding the current code.
>>
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I agree, -stable can live without the patches 2 an 3.

Ok, I applied patch 1 for fix/urgent + stable and 2/3 for the next release.

-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web