Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1301312 > unrolled thread

[PATCH V2] tty/n_gsm.c: use gsm->num to remove mux itself from gsm_mux[]

Started byPan Xinhui <xinhui@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
First post2016-01-05 08:50 +0100
Last post2016-01-05 13:30 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH V2] tty/n_gsm.c: use gsm->num to remove mux itself from gsm_mux[] Pan Xinhui <xinhui@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-05 08:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH V2] tty/n_gsm.c: use gsm->num to remove mux itself from  gsm_mux[] One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2016-01-05 13:30 +0100

#1301312 — [PATCH V2] tty/n_gsm.c: use gsm->num to remove mux itself from gsm_mux[]

FromPan Xinhui <xinhui@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date2016-01-05 08:50 +0100
Subject[PATCH V2] tty/n_gsm.c: use gsm->num to remove mux itself from gsm_mux[]
Message-ID<qNuxr-7ih-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

There is one filed gsm->num to store mux's index of gsm_mux[]. So use
gsm->num to remove itself from gsm_mux[] instead of the for-loop
traverse in gsm_cleanup_mux().

Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
change from V1:
	lock is also held for the if()
---
 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c | 13 +++++--------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
index 9aff371..697b31e 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
@@ -2038,16 +2038,13 @@ static void gsm_cleanup_mux(struct gsm_mux *gsm)
 	gsm->dead = 1;
 
 	spin_lock(&gsm_mux_lock);
-	for (i = 0; i < MAX_MUX; i++) {
-		if (gsm_mux[i] == gsm) {
-			gsm_mux[i] = NULL;
-			break;
-		}
-	}
-	spin_unlock(&gsm_mux_lock);
 	/* open failed before registering => nothing to do */
-	if (i == MAX_MUX)
+	if (gsm_mux[gsm->num] != gsm) {
+		spin_unlock(&gsm_mux_lock);
 		return;
+	}
+	gsm_mux[gsm->num] = NULL;
+	spin_unlock(&gsm_mux_lock);
 
 	/* In theory disconnecting DLCI 0 is sufficient but for some
 	   modems this is apparently not the case. */
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1301486 — Re: [PATCH V2] tty/n_gsm.c: use gsm->num to remove mux itself from gsm_mux[]

FromOne Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date2016-01-05 13:30 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH V2] tty/n_gsm.c: use gsm->num to remove mux itself from gsm_mux[]
Message-ID<qNyUq-2G0-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1301312
On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 15:42:52 +0800
Pan Xinhui <xinhui@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> There is one filed gsm->num to store mux's index of gsm_mux[]. So use
> gsm->num to remove itself from gsm_mux[] instead of the for-loop
> traverse in gsm_cleanup_mux().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web