Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1300674 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-04 13:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-01-11 12:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH v5 07/11] arm-cci: Add routines to save/restore all counters "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> - 2016-01-04 13:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 07/11] arm-cci: Add routines to save/restore all counters "Suzuki K. Poulose" <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com> - 2016-01-11 12:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 07/11] arm-cci: Add routines to save/restore all counters Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-01-11 12:00 +0100
| From | "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-04 13:00 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH v5 07/11] arm-cci: Add routines to save/restore all counters |
| Message-ID | <qNbXQ-2ZX-35@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Adds helper routines to disable the counter controls for
all the counters on the CCI PMU and restore it back, by
preserving the original state in caller provided mask.
Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
---
drivers/bus/arm-cci.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
index a3938ef..2f1fcf0 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
@@ -672,6 +672,44 @@ static void pmu_set_event(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, int idx, unsigned long event)
}
/*
+ * For all counters on the CCI-PMU, disable any 'enabled' counters,
+ * saving the changed counters in the mask, so that we can restore
+ * it later using pmu_restore_counters. The mask is private to the
+ * caller. We cannot rely on the used_mask maintained by the CCI_PMU
+ * as it only tells us if the counter is assigned to perf_event or not.
+ * The state of the perf_event cannot be locked by the PMU layer, hence
+ * we check the individual counter status (which can be locked by
+ * cci_pm->hw_events->pmu_lock).
+ *
+ * @mask should be initialised by the caller.
+ */
+static void __maybe_unused
+pmu_save_counters(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, unsigned long *mask)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < cci_pmu->num_cntrs; i++) {
+ if (pmu_counter_is_enabled(cci_pmu, i)) {
+ set_bit(i, mask);
+ pmu_disable_counter(cci_pmu, i);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * Restore the status of the counters. Reversal of the pmu_disable_counters().
+ * For each counter set in the mask, enable the counter back.
+ */
+static void __maybe_unused
+pmu_restore_counters(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, unsigned long *mask)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for_each_set_bit(i, mask, cci_pmu->num_cntrs)
+ pmu_enable_counter(cci_pmu, i);
+}
+
+/*
* Returns the number of programmable counters actually implemented
* by the cci
*/
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Suzuki K. Poulose" <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 12:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 07/11] arm-cci: Add routines to save/restore all counters |
| Message-ID | <qPImD-1cN-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1300674 |
On 11/01/16 10:50, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 11:54:46AM +0000, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote: >> Adds helper routines to disable the counter controls for >> all the counters on the CCI PMU and restore it back, by >> preserving the original state in caller provided mask. >> >> Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com> >> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> >> --- >> drivers/bus/arm-cci.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c >> index a3938ef..2f1fcf0 100644 >> --- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c >> +++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c >> @@ -672,6 +672,44 @@ static void pmu_set_event(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, int idx, unsigned long event) >> } >> >> /* >> + * For all counters on the CCI-PMU, disable any 'enabled' counters, >> + * saving the changed counters in the mask, so that we can restore >> + * it later using pmu_restore_counters. The mask is private to the >> + * caller. We cannot rely on the used_mask maintained by the CCI_PMU >> + * as it only tells us if the counter is assigned to perf_event or not. >> + * The state of the perf_event cannot be locked by the PMU layer, hence >> + * we check the individual counter status (which can be locked by >> + * cci_pm->hw_events->pmu_lock). >> + * >> + * @mask should be initialised by the caller. > > We should probably state "initialised to zero", or "empty". Yep, will fix it. >> +/* >> + * Restore the status of the counters. Reversal of the pmu_disable_counters(). >> + * For each counter set in the mask, enable the counter back. >> + */ > > Shouldn't that say pmu_save_counters? Yea, missed it in rebase. > With that: > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> > Thanks Suzuki
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 12:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 07/11] arm-cci: Add routines to save/restore all counters |
| Message-ID | <qPImD-1cN-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1300674 |
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 11:54:46AM +0000, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> Adds helper routines to disable the counter controls for
> all the counters on the CCI PMU and restore it back, by
> preserving the original state in caller provided mask.
>
> Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/bus/arm-cci.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> index a3938ef..2f1fcf0 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> @@ -672,6 +672,44 @@ static void pmu_set_event(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, int idx, unsigned long event)
> }
>
> /*
> + * For all counters on the CCI-PMU, disable any 'enabled' counters,
> + * saving the changed counters in the mask, so that we can restore
> + * it later using pmu_restore_counters. The mask is private to the
> + * caller. We cannot rely on the used_mask maintained by the CCI_PMU
> + * as it only tells us if the counter is assigned to perf_event or not.
> + * The state of the perf_event cannot be locked by the PMU layer, hence
> + * we check the individual counter status (which can be locked by
> + * cci_pm->hw_events->pmu_lock).
> + *
> + * @mask should be initialised by the caller.
We should probably state "initialised to zero", or "empty".
> + */
> +static void __maybe_unused
> +pmu_save_counters(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, unsigned long *mask)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < cci_pmu->num_cntrs; i++) {
> + if (pmu_counter_is_enabled(cci_pmu, i)) {
> + set_bit(i, mask);
> + pmu_disable_counter(cci_pmu, i);
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Restore the status of the counters. Reversal of the pmu_disable_counters().
> + * For each counter set in the mask, enable the counter back.
> + */
Shouldn't that say pmu_save_counters?
With that:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Mark.
> +static void __maybe_unused
> +pmu_restore_counters(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, unsigned long *mask)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for_each_set_bit(i, mask, cci_pmu->num_cntrs)
> + pmu_enable_counter(cci_pmu, i);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> * Returns the number of programmable counters actually implemented
> * by the cci
> */
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web