Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1300590 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v2] udf: avoid uninitialized variable use

Started byJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
First post2016-01-04 11:00 +0100
Last post2016-01-04 11:50 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v2] udf: avoid uninitialized variable use Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2016-01-04 11:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v2] udf: avoid uninitialized variable use Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-01-04 11:50 +0100

#1300590 — Re: [PATCH v2] udf: avoid uninitialized variable use

FromJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Date2016-01-04 11:00 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] udf: avoid uninitialized variable use
Message-ID<qNa5I-1L4-19@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Fri 01-01-16 15:21:54, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> A new warning about a real bug has come up from a recent cleanup:
> 
> fs/udf/inode.c: In function 'udf_setup_indirect_aext':
> fs/udf/inode.c:1927:28: warning: 'adsize' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> 
> If the alloc_type is neither ICBTAG_FLAG_AD_SHORT nor ICBTAG_FLAG_AD_LONG,
> the value of adsize is undefined. This changes the code to use zero for adsize
> in that case, which may be the correct solution, though I have not looked
> at the code in enough detail to know if it should be something else instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Fixes: fcea62babc81 ("udf: Factor out code for creating indirect extent")
> ---
> sorry for missing another instance the first time around. The warning is
> a bit unreliable and it seems in my first configuration I got it only
> for one of the two instances that show it in other configuration.
> 
> After checking the remaining functions in this file for the same possible
> problem, I found that the other functions use either 'BUG()' or 'return -EIO'
> in the 'else' path, so I assume the two functions here should one of those
> as well, but I don't know which.

Callers of these functions make sure alloc_type is one of the two valid
ones. However for future-proofing you're right that probably we should
handle the invalid case as well. Setting adsize to zero is problematic -
not sure what the code would actually do but it wouldn't definitely work.
I'd just return -EIO. Attached is the patch I have merged.

								Honza
> 
> diff --git a/fs/udf/inode.c b/fs/udf/inode.c
> index 5b83351041a4..42f68dd7e6ef 100644
> --- a/fs/udf/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/udf/inode.c
> @@ -1890,6 +1890,8 @@ int udf_setup_indirect_aext(struct inode *inode, int block,
>  		adsize = sizeof(struct short_ad);
>  	else if (UDF_I(inode)->i_alloc_type == ICBTAG_FLAG_AD_LONG)
>  		adsize = sizeof(struct long_ad);
> +	else
> +		adsize = 0;
>  
>  	neloc.logicalBlockNum = block;
>  	neloc.partitionReferenceNum = epos->block.partitionReferenceNum;
> @@ -1963,6 +1965,8 @@ int __udf_add_aext(struct inode *inode, struct extent_position *epos,
>  		adsize = sizeof(struct short_ad);
>  	else if (iinfo->i_alloc_type == ICBTAG_FLAG_AD_LONG)
>  		adsize = sizeof(struct long_ad);
> +	else
> +		adsize = 0;
>  
>  	if (!epos->bh) {
>  		WARN_ON(iinfo->i_lenAlloc !=
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1300625

FromArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date2016-01-04 11:50 +0100
Message-ID<qNaS5-2gZ-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1300590
On Monday 04 January 2016 10:56:05 Jan Kara wrote:
> On Fri 01-01-16 15:21:54, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > A new warning about a real bug has come up from a recent cleanup:
> > 
> > fs/udf/inode.c: In function 'udf_setup_indirect_aext':
> > fs/udf/inode.c:1927:28: warning: 'adsize' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> > 
> > If the alloc_type is neither ICBTAG_FLAG_AD_SHORT nor ICBTAG_FLAG_AD_LONG,
> > the value of adsize is undefined. This changes the code to use zero for adsize
> > in that case, which may be the correct solution, though I have not looked
> > at the code in enough detail to know if it should be something else instead.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > Fixes: fcea62babc81 ("udf: Factor out code for creating indirect extent")
> > ---
> > sorry for missing another instance the first time around. The warning is
> > a bit unreliable and it seems in my first configuration I got it only
> > for one of the two instances that show it in other configuration.
> > 
> > After checking the remaining functions in this file for the same possible
> > problem, I found that the other functions use either 'BUG()' or 'return -EIO'
> > in the 'else' path, so I assume the two functions here should one of those
> > as well, but I don't know which.
> 
> Callers of these functions make sure alloc_type is one of the two valid
> ones. However for future-proofing you're right that probably we should
> handle the invalid case as well. Setting adsize to zero is problematic -
> not sure what the code would actually do but it wouldn't definitely work.
> I'd just return -EIO. Attached is the patch I have merged.
> 
> 

Looks good, thanks!

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web