Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1302743 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] spi/spi-fsl-espi.c: Add spi cs polarity support

Started byAndreas Werner <andy@wernerandy.de>
First post2016-01-06 14:10 +0100
Last post2016-01-06 18:40 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH] spi/spi-fsl-espi.c: Add spi cs polarity support Andreas Werner <andy@wernerandy.de> - 2016-01-06 14:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] spi/spi-fsl-espi.c: Add spi cs polarity support Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-01-06 18:40 +0100

#1302743 — Re: [PATCH] spi/spi-fsl-espi.c: Add spi cs polarity support

FromAndreas Werner <andy@wernerandy.de>
Date2016-01-06 14:10 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH] spi/spi-fsl-espi.c: Add spi cs polarity support
Message-ID<qNW0I-1yG-49@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi,
any comments for this patches?

Regards
Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1302913

FromMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Date2016-01-06 18:40 +0100
Message-ID<qO0dY-4eZ-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1302743

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 02:00:40PM +0100, Andreas Werner wrote:
> Hi,
> any comments for this patches?
> 
> Regards
> Andy

Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so 
on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  Sending content
free pings just adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at all) and if 
something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches anyway.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web