Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1298115 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix missing mutex unlocks

Started byIvaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>
First post2015-12-25 14:40 +0100
Last post2016-01-01 13:30 +0100
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix missing mutex  unlocks Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com> - 2015-12-25 14:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix missing mutex  unlocks Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> - 2015-12-29 08:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix missing mutex  unlocks Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com> - 2016-01-01 13:30 +0100

#1298115 — Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix missing mutex unlocks

FromIvaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>
Date2015-12-25 14:40 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix missing mutex unlocks
Message-ID<qJAL8-46D-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi Tomi,

On 13.01.2014 12:20, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 2014-01-11 11:39, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
>
>> The patch does not apply cleanly on top of rc7, however I applied it by
>> hand. So far it seems it fixes the issue brought by
>> c37dd677988ca50bc8bc60ab5ab053720583c168, though I didn't test if
>> mutex_lock/mutex_unlock are complementary in every code path (at least
>> not explicitly, I guess maemo is doing it for us anyway :) ).
>
> Ok, thanks.
>
>> So, shall I send a patch incorporating your code changes, or you will do
>> it?
>
> I can handle it.
>
>   Tomi
>
>

I still don't see those fixes in mainline, shall I send a patch?

Ivo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1298905

FromTomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Date2015-12-29 08:50 +0100
Message-ID<qKXcC-5MT-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1298115

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 25/12/15 15:29, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
> 
> Hi Tomi,
> 
> On 13.01.2014 12:20, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> On 2014-01-11 11:39, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
>>
>>> The patch does not apply cleanly on top of rc7, however I applied it by
>>> hand. So far it seems it fixes the issue brought by
>>> c37dd677988ca50bc8bc60ab5ab053720583c168, though I didn't test if
>>> mutex_lock/mutex_unlock are complementary in every code path (at least
>>> not explicitly, I guess maemo is doing it for us anyway :) ).
>>
>> Ok, thanks.
>>
>>> So, shall I send a patch incorporating your code changes, or you will do
>>> it?
>>
>> I can handle it.
>>
>>   Tomi
>>
>>
> 
> I still don't see those fixes in mainline, shall I send a patch?

Oh, I'm sorry, I must have forgotten about that. Please, send a new patch.

 Tomi

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1299895

FromIvaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>
Date2016-01-01 13:30 +0100
Message-ID<qM70e-2ob-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1298905

On 29.12.2015 09:46, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>
> Oh, I'm sorry, I must have forgotten about that. Please, send a new patch.
>
>   Tomi
>

Actually it is me to be sorry for making noise, I've missed 
0eb0dafb674cd6bfac2e3204b2f8b907e26b1138 with all those patches moving 
files around.

Ivo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web