Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1298818 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-12-29 02:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2015-12-29 18:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] cfq-iosched: convert slice idle time to jiffies Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 02:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: convert slice idle time to jiffies Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2015-12-29 18:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: convert slice idle time to jiffies Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 18:40 +0100
| From | Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-29 02:10 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH] cfq-iosched: convert slice idle time to jiffies |
| Message-ID | <qKQXw-1JA-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
This patch refers to Jens Axboe's change way back in 2006: 7b14e3b52 cfq-iosched: slice expiry fixups In this patch he fixed a potential timer race condition by delaying idle_slice_timer by the slice_idle time value. Today this timer is delayed by either slice_idle or group_idle time values, which on my system, and according to Documentation/block/cfq-iosched.txt the default value for both is 8ms. Since the time given by either variables is supposed to be in milliseconds we should convert that value from milliseconds to jiffies before adding it to jiffies variable and setting our timer. In my obervations the area is really active as I've seen that function get called a lot for each device on my btrfs raid setup during btrfs check. I've also timed the btrfs check before and after applying the patch and I might've noticed a very slight improvement in execution time but the numbers vary too much for me to post any believable numbers (10 milliseconds difference at most on average). Signed-off-by: Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexader00@gmail.com> --- block/cfq-iosched.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c index 1f9093e..eec65fb 100644 --- a/block/cfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c @@ -2958,7 +2958,7 @@ static void cfq_arm_slice_timer(struct cfq_data *cfqd) else sl = cfqd->cfq_slice_idle; - mod_timer(&cfqd->idle_slice_timer, jiffies + sl); + mod_timer(&cfqd->idle_slice_timer, jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(sl)); cfqg_stats_set_start_idle_time(cfqq->cfqg); cfq_log_cfqq(cfqd, cfqq, "arm_idle: %lu group_idle: %d", sl, group_idle ? 1 : 0); -- 1.9.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-29 18:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qL66f-3rU-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1298818 |
On 12/28/2015 06:08 PM, Alexandru Moise wrote: > This patch refers to Jens Axboe's change way back in 2006: > 7b14e3b52 cfq-iosched: slice expiry fixups > > In this patch he fixed a potential timer race condition by delaying > idle_slice_timer by the slice_idle time value. > > Today this timer is delayed by either slice_idle or group_idle time > values, which on my system, and according to > Documentation/block/cfq-iosched.txt the default value for both is 8ms. > > Since the time given by either variables is supposed to be in > milliseconds we should convert that value from milliseconds to jiffies > before adding it to jiffies variable and setting our timer. > > In my obervations the area is really active as I've seen that function > get called a lot for each device on my btrfs raid setup during btrfs > check. I've also timed the btrfs check before and after applying the > patch and I might've noticed a very slight improvement in execution > time but the numbers vary too much for me to post any believable > numbers (10 milliseconds difference at most on average). cfqd->cfq_slice_idle is in jiffies, it's not in msecs. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-29 18:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qL6pB-3za-35@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1299060 |
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 10:19:17AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 12/28/2015 06:08 PM, Alexandru Moise wrote: > >This patch refers to Jens Axboe's change way back in 2006: > >7b14e3b52 cfq-iosched: slice expiry fixups > > > >In this patch he fixed a potential timer race condition by delaying > >idle_slice_timer by the slice_idle time value. > > > >Today this timer is delayed by either slice_idle or group_idle time > >values, which on my system, and according to > >Documentation/block/cfq-iosched.txt the default value for both is 8ms. > > > >Since the time given by either variables is supposed to be in > >milliseconds we should convert that value from milliseconds to jiffies > >before adding it to jiffies variable and setting our timer. > > > >In my obervations the area is really active as I've seen that function > >get called a lot for each device on my btrfs raid setup during btrfs > >check. I've also timed the btrfs check before and after applying the > >patch and I might've noticed a very slight improvement in execution > >time but the numbers vary too much for me to post any believable > >numbers (10 milliseconds difference at most on average). > > cfqd->cfq_slice_idle is in jiffies, it's not in msecs. > > -- > Jens Axboe > Then should I only do the conversion in the case of group_idle? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web