Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1297848 > unrolled thread

Re: [net] ceb5d58b21: -69.2% fsmark.files_per_sec

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [net] ceb5d58b21: -69.2% fsmark.files_per_sec Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> - 2015-12-24 14:20 +0100
    Re: [LKP] [net] ceb5d58b21: -69.2% fsmark.files_per_sec "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> - 2015-12-28 03:50 +0100

#1297848 — Re: [net] ceb5d58b21: -69.2% fsmark.files_per_sec

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 9:49 PM, kernel test robot
<ying.huang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> commit ceb5d58b217098a657f3850b7a2640f995032e62 ("net: fix sock_wake_async() rcu protection")
>
>
> =========================================================================================
> compiler/cpufreq_governor/disk/filesize/fs2/fs/iterations/kconfig/nr_threads/rootfs/sync_method/tbox_group/test_size/testcase:
>   gcc-4.9/performance/1BRD_48G/4M/nfsv4/xfs/1x/x86_64-rhel/64t/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/NoSync/lkp-hsx04/40G/fsmark
>
> commit:
>   9cd3e072b0be17446e37d7414eac8a3499e0601e
>   ceb5d58b217098a657f3850b7a2640f995032e62
>
> 9cd3e072b0be1744 ceb5d58b217098a657f3850b7a
> ---------------- --------------------------
>          %stddev     %change         %stddev

> Thanks,
> Ying Huang

Hi Ying. I have no idea what these confusing numbers mean.

Is your benchmark running faster (good thing) or slower (sorry, but we
fixed a bug)

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1298434 — Re: [LKP] [net] ceb5d58b21: -69.2% fsmark.files_per_sec

Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> writes:

> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 9:49 PM, kernel test robot
> <ying.huang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>> commit ceb5d58b217098a657f3850b7a2640f995032e62 ("net: fix sock_wake_async() rcu protection")
>>
>>
>> =========================================================================================
>> compiler/cpufreq_governor/disk/filesize/fs2/fs/iterations/kconfig/nr_threads/rootfs/sync_method/tbox_group/test_size/testcase:
>>   gcc-4.9/performance/1BRD_48G/4M/nfsv4/xfs/1x/x86_64-rhel/64t/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/NoSync/lkp-hsx04/40G/fsmark
>>
>> commit:
>>   9cd3e072b0be17446e37d7414eac8a3499e0601e
>>   ceb5d58b217098a657f3850b7a2640f995032e62
>>
>> 9cd3e072b0be1744 ceb5d58b217098a657f3850b7a
>> ---------------- --------------------------
>>          %stddev     %change         %stddev
>
>> Thanks,
>> Ying Huang
>
> Hi Ying. I have no idea what these confusing numbers mean.
>
> Is your benchmark running faster (good thing) or slower (sorry, but we
> fixed a bug)

The benchmark running slower now.  This has big impact on performance,
maybe we can find some clue to optimize from the test result?  The
benchmark is about file IO performance on a loop back mounted NFS.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web