Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1297326 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] cpufreq/scpi: fix handling return value of topology_physical_package_id

Started byAndrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
First post2015-12-23 11:40 +0100
Last post2015-12-23 11:50 +0100
Articles 8 — 6 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

Contents

  [PATCH] cpufreq/scpi: fix handling return value of  topology_physical_package_id Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> - 2015-12-23 11:40 +0100
    [PATCH] pinctrl: nsp-gpio: fix type of iterator Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> - 2015-12-23 11:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: nsp-gpio: fix type of iterator Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com> - 2015-12-23 23:40 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: nsp-gpio: fix type of iterator Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy <yrdreddy@broadcom.com> - 2015-12-24 06:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: nsp-gpio: fix type of iterator Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2015-12-24 10:10 +0100
    [PATCH] NFC: nci: fix handling return value of nci_hci_create_pipe Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> - 2015-12-23 11:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] cpufreq/scpi: fix handling return value of  topology_physical_package_id Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-12-23 11:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] cpufreq/scpi: fix handling return value of  topology_physical_package_id Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2015-12-23 11:50 +0100

#1297326 — [PATCH] cpufreq/scpi: fix handling return value of topology_physical_package_id

FromAndrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Date2015-12-23 11:40 +0100
Subject[PATCH] cpufreq/scpi: fix handling return value of topology_physical_package_id
Message-ID<qIOZP-8qJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
The function can return negative values, so its result should
be assigned to signed variable.

The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].

[1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
index 2c3b16f..de5e89b 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static struct scpi_ops *scpi_ops;
 
 static struct scpi_dvfs_info *scpi_get_dvfs_info(struct device *cpu_dev)
 {
-	u8 domain = topology_physical_package_id(cpu_dev->id);
+	int domain = topology_physical_package_id(cpu_dev->id);
 
 	if (domain < 0)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1297327 — [PATCH] pinctrl: nsp-gpio: fix type of iterator

FromAndrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Date2015-12-23 11:40 +0100
Subject[PATCH] pinctrl: nsp-gpio: fix type of iterator
Message-ID<qIOZQ-8qJ-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1297326
Iterator i declared as unsigned is always non-negative so the
loop will never end.

The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].

[1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
index 34648f6..ad5b04c 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
@@ -439,7 +439,8 @@ static int nsp_gpio_set_strength(struct nsp_gpio *chip, unsigned gpio,
 static int nsp_gpio_get_strength(struct nsp_gpio *chip, unsigned gpio,
 				 u16 *strength)
 {
-	unsigned int i, offset, shift;
+	unsigned int offset, shift;
+	int i;
 	u32 val;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1297676 — Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: nsp-gpio: fix type of iterator

FromRay Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
Date2015-12-23 23:40 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH] pinctrl: nsp-gpio: fix type of iterator
Message-ID<qJ0eB-6Yd-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1297327
+ Reddy

On 12/23/2015 2:37 AM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> Iterator i declared as unsigned is always non-negative so the
> loop will never end.
>
> The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
> scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].
>
> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
> ---
>   drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c | 3 ++-
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
> index 34648f6..ad5b04c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
> @@ -439,7 +439,8 @@ static int nsp_gpio_set_strength(struct nsp_gpio *chip, unsigned gpio,
>   static int nsp_gpio_get_strength(struct nsp_gpio *chip, unsigned gpio,
>   				 u16 *strength)
>   {
> -	unsigned int i, offset, shift;
> +	unsigned int offset, shift;
> +	int i;
>   	u32 val;
>   	unsigned long flags;
>
>

The fix is a valid fix. And at the same time it exposes other potential 
issues in the driver. I just found the loop used in _set_strength and 
_get_strength is inconsistent:

In _set_strength:

427         for (i = GPIO_DRV_STRENGTH_BITS; i > 0; i--) {

For i to start at GPIO_DRV_STRENGTH_BITS, it seems to be wrong.

428                 val = readl(chip->io_ctrl + offset);
429                 val &= ~BIT(shift);
430                 val |= ((strength >> (i-1)) & 0x1) << shift;
431                 writel(val, chip->io_ctrl + offset);
432                 offset += 4;
433         }

In _get_strength:

451         for (i = (GPIO_DRV_STRENGTH_BITS - 1); i >= 0; i--) {
452                 val = readl(chip->io_ctrl + offset) & BIT(shift);
453                 val >>= shift;
454                 *strength += (val << i);
455                 offset += 4;
456         }

Reddy, could you please review and comment?

Thanks,

Ray


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1297756 — Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: nsp-gpio: fix type of iterator

FromYendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy <yrdreddy@broadcom.com>
Date2015-12-24 06:40 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH] pinctrl: nsp-gpio: fix type of iterator
Message-ID<qJ6N3-2HN-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1297676

On 12/24/2015 4:05 AM, Ray Jui wrote:
> + Reddy
>
> On 12/23/2015 2:37 AM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> Iterator i declared as unsigned is always non-negative so the
>> loop will never end.
>>
>> The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
>> scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].
>>
>> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c | 3 ++-
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
>> index 34648f6..ad5b04c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
>> @@ -439,7 +439,8 @@ static int nsp_gpio_set_strength(struct nsp_gpio *chip, unsigned gpio,
>>   static int nsp_gpio_get_strength(struct nsp_gpio *chip, unsigned gpio,
>>   				 u16 *strength)
>>   {
>> -	unsigned int i, offset, shift;
>> +	unsigned int offset, shift;
>> +	int i;
>>   	u32 val;
>>   	unsigned long flags;
>>
>>
> The fix is a valid fix. And at the same time it exposes other potential 
> issues in the driver. I just found the loop used in _set_strength and 
> _get_strength is inconsistent:
>
> In _set_strength:
>
> 427         for (i = GPIO_DRV_STRENGTH_BITS; i > 0; i--) {
>
> For i to start at GPIO_DRV_STRENGTH_BITS, it seems to be wrong.
>
> 428                 val = readl(chip->io_ctrl + offset);
> 429                 val &= ~BIT(shift);
> 430                 val |= ((strength >> (i-1)) & 0x1) << shift;
> 431                 writel(val, chip->io_ctrl + offset);
> 432                 offset += 4;
> 433         }
>
> In _get_strength:
>
> 451         for (i = (GPIO_DRV_STRENGTH_BITS - 1); i >= 0; i--) {
> 452                 val = readl(chip->io_ctrl + offset) & BIT(shift);
> 453                 val >>= shift;
> 454                 *strength += (val << i);
> 455                 offset += 4;
> 456         }
>
> Reddy, could you please review and comment?

Hi Ray,

             The logic is correct. The drive strength has three bits distributed in three registers. In one case the "-1" is in for loop initialization and the other case it is in the for loop body. The fix looks good.

Thanks
Dhananjay

> Thanks,
>
> Ray
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1297785 — Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: nsp-gpio: fix type of iterator

FromLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date2015-12-24 10:10 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH] pinctrl: nsp-gpio: fix type of iterator
Message-ID<qJa4h-4Qs-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1297327
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> wrote:

> Iterator i declared as unsigned is always non-negative so the
> loop will never end.
>
> The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
> scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].
>
> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>

I already applied Dan Carpenters fix, somehow it was earlier
in my mail flow. Thanks anyways!

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1297328 — [PATCH] NFC: nci: fix handling return value of nci_hci_create_pipe

FromAndrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Date2015-12-23 11:40 +0100
Subject[PATCH] NFC: nci: fix handling return value of nci_hci_create_pipe
Message-ID<qIOZQ-8qJ-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1297326
The function return NCI_HCI_INVALID_PIPE in case of error.

The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].

[1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
---
 net/nfc/nci/hci.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/nfc/nci/hci.c b/net/nfc/nci/hci.c
index 2aedac1..a0ab26d 100644
--- a/net/nfc/nci/hci.c
+++ b/net/nfc/nci/hci.c
@@ -676,7 +676,7 @@ int nci_hci_connect_gate(struct nci_dev *ndev,
 	break;
 	default:
 		pipe = nci_hci_create_pipe(ndev, dest_host, dest_gate, &r);
-		if (pipe < 0)
+		if (pipe == NCI_HCI_INVALID_PIPE)
 			return r;
 		pipe_created = true;
 		break;
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1297333

FromViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date2015-12-23 11:50 +0100
Message-ID<qIP9v-8u4-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1297326
On 23-12-15, 11:37, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> The function can return negative values, so its result should
> be assigned to signed variable.
> 
> The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
> scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].
> 
> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
> index 2c3b16f..de5e89b 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static struct scpi_ops *scpi_ops;
>  
>  static struct scpi_dvfs_info *scpi_get_dvfs_info(struct device *cpu_dev)
>  {
> -	u8 domain = topology_physical_package_id(cpu_dev->id);
> +	int domain = topology_physical_package_id(cpu_dev->id);
>  
>  	if (domain < 0)
>  		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1297340

FromSudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Date2015-12-23 11:50 +0100
Message-ID<qIP9w-8u4-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1297326

On 23/12/15 10:37, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> The function can return negative values, so its result should
> be assigned to signed variable.
>
> The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
> scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].
>
> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576
>

There has a patch posted by Dan Carpenter [1] which I reposted[2],
but it again slipped through the cracks. I will poke Rafael again on that.

[1] 
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-October/380292.html
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/15/219

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web