Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1292644 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-12-16 00:40 +0100 |
| Last post | 2015-12-17 00:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 12/19] ARM: dts: exynos: replace legacy *,wakeup property with wakeup-source Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2015-12-16 00:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 12/19] ARM: dts: exynos: replace legacy *,wakeup property with wakeup-source Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2015-12-16 11:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 12/19] ARM: dts: exynos: replace legacy *,wakeup property with wakeup-source Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2015-12-17 00:40 +0100
| From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-16 00:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 12/19] ARM: dts: exynos: replace legacy *,wakeup property with wakeup-source |
| Message-ID | <qG7mh-2sQ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 16.12.2015 01:35, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > On 21/10/15 11:10, Sudeep Holla wrote: >> Though the keyboard and other driver will continue to support the legacy >> "gpio-key,wakeup", "linux-keypad,wakeup" boolean property to enable the >> wakeup source, "wakeup-source" is the new standard binding. >> >> This patch replaces all the legacy wakeup properties with the unified >> "wakeup-source" property in order to avoid any futher copy-paste >> duplication. >> >> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> >> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> > > Ping, do you prefer taking via your tree or should I send to armsoc > directly ? Usually it depends on the dependencies... but: 1. I just received this patch - 12/19. 2. No cover letter, no other patches, no explanation about any dependencies or other related changes. Nothing. Just one patch. 3. The patch mentions new standard binding. Was the new binding already merged? Or is it part of these series? What about backward compatibility? BR, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-16 11:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qGhF0-zW-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1292644 |
On 15/12/15 23:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 16.12.2015 01:35, Sudeep Holla wrote: >> >> >> On 21/10/15 11:10, Sudeep Holla wrote: >>> Though the keyboard and other driver will continue to support the legacy >>> "gpio-key,wakeup", "linux-keypad,wakeup" boolean property to enable the >>> wakeup source, "wakeup-source" is the new standard binding. >>> >>> This patch replaces all the legacy wakeup properties with the unified >>> "wakeup-source" property in order to avoid any futher copy-paste >>> duplication. >>> >>> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> >>> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> >> >> Ping, do you prefer taking via your tree or should I send to armsoc >> directly ? > > Usually it depends on the dependencies... but: > 1. I just received this patch - 12/19. Sorry for that. The initial idea was to show all the changes but merge the binding and dependencies first, so didn't cc all. > 2. No cover letter, no other patches, no explanation about any > dependencies or other related changes. Nothing. Just one patch. Yes this was initially posted as part of the series, but only dependencies were merged for v4.4 > 3. The patch mentions new standard binding. Was the new binding already > merged? Or is it part of these series? What about backward compatibility? Not a brand new binding, but made existing one a standard so that we don't continue to be creative and generate more bindings for the same thing. Yes binding and dependent patches are already in mainline. And yes backward compatibility is maintained as mentioned in the commit message. -- Regards, Sudeep -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-17 00:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qGtPQ-8mr-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1292878 |
On 16.12.2015 19:32, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > On 15/12/15 23:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 16.12.2015 01:35, Sudeep Holla wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 21/10/15 11:10, Sudeep Holla wrote: >>>> Though the keyboard and other driver will continue to support the >>>> legacy >>>> "gpio-key,wakeup", "linux-keypad,wakeup" boolean property to enable the >>>> wakeup source, "wakeup-source" is the new standard binding. >>>> >>>> This patch replaces all the legacy wakeup properties with the unified >>>> "wakeup-source" property in order to avoid any futher copy-paste >>>> duplication. >>>> >>>> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> >>>> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> >>> >>> Ping, do you prefer taking via your tree or should I send to armsoc >>> directly ? >> >> Usually it depends on the dependencies... but: >> 1. I just received this patch - 12/19. > > Sorry for that. The initial idea was to show all the changes but merge > the binding and dependencies first, so didn't cc all. > >> 2. No cover letter, no other patches, no explanation about any >> dependencies or other related changes. Nothing. Just one patch. > > Yes this was initially posted as part of the series, but only > dependencies were merged for v4.4 > >> 3. The patch mentions new standard binding. Was the new binding already >> merged? Or is it part of these series? What about backward compatibility? > > Not a brand new binding, but made existing one a standard so that we > don't continue to be creative and generate more bindings for the same > thing. Yes binding and dependent patches are already in mainline. And > yes backward compatibility is maintained as mentioned in the commit > message. That explains everything, thanks. We'll take it through samsung-soc, just give me some time for review. As for other patch - the s5pv210 - I did not get it directly but I think I can find it on list subscription archives. Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web