Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1293615 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for  SMDK5410 Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2015-12-17 06:20 +0100
    RE: [PATCH v9 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for  SMDK5410 Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com> - 2015-12-18 10:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support  for SMDK5410 Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2015-12-23 13:20 +0100

#1293615 — Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410

On 16.11.2015 16:43, Pavel Fedin wrote:
> This patch extends Exynos SROM controller driver with ability to configure
> controller outputs and enables SMSC9115 Ethernet chip on SMDK5410 board,
> which is connected via SROMc bank #3.
> 
> With this patchset, support for the whole existing SMDK range can be added.
> Actually, only bank number is different.
> 
> This patchset also depends on Exynos 5410 pinctrl support, introduced by
> patches 0003 and 0004 from this set:
> [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: EXYNOS: ODROID-XU DT and LEDs
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330862.html
> 
> Pinctrl support is necessary in order to correctly configure
> multifunctional pins of the Exynos chip.
> 

Let me share the plan/status:
1. Currently Kukjin Kim is out of office (he told me he will be back on
Christmas).
2. I asked arm-soc people to pull my previous pull requests.

3. I applied this patchset to my branch:
next/stuff-late-not-split-per-branch
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git/log/?h=next/stuff-late-not-split-per-branch

4. This branch is not pushed to linux-next. I will sort it out if my
previous pull requests get in. I will be out of office for Christmas so
depending on the timing of {arm-soc,Christmas,Kukjin} this may or may
not go into v4.5 (yay...).

5. If it does not get into v4.5, I will rebase it and proceed further
for v4.6.

If you have any questions, please let me know.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1294599

 Hello!

> 4. This branch is not pushed to linux-next. I will sort it out if my
> previous pull requests get in. I will be out of office for Christmas so
> depending on the timing of {arm-soc,Christmas,Kukjin} this may or may
> not go into v4.5 (yay...).
> 
> 5. If it does not get into v4.5, I will rebase it and proceed further
> for v4.6.
> 
> If you have any questions, please let me know.

 Thank you very much. No, i don't have any questions, i'm glad that my work is picked up and not lost, i'm just keeping an eye on it
until it goes to stable.

 P.S. Not related to these sets directly, just to note... When i was writing the doc for SROMc bindings, i noticed that we have two
directories for Exynos in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm:
1. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos
2. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/Samsung

 In (1) we have only a single old file, shouldn't this be cleaned up and shouldn't this file be moved to (2)?

Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1297409 — Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410

W dniu 18.12.2015 o 18:16, Pavel Fedin pisze:
>  Hello!
> 
>> 4. This branch is not pushed to linux-next. I will sort it out if my
>> previous pull requests get in. I will be out of office for Christmas so
>> depending on the timing of {arm-soc,Christmas,Kukjin} this may or may
>> not go into v4.5 (yay...).
>>
>> 5. If it does not get into v4.5, I will rebase it and proceed further
>> for v4.6.
>>
>> If you have any questions, please let me know.
> 
>  Thank you very much. No, i don't have any questions, i'm glad that my work is picked up and not lost, i'm just keeping an eye on it
> until it goes to stable.
> 
>  P.S. Not related to these sets directly, just to note... When i was writing the doc for SROMc bindings, i noticed that we have two
> directories for Exynos in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm:
> 1. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos
> 2. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/Samsung
> 
>  In (1) we have only a single old file, shouldn't this be cleaned up and shouldn't this file be moved to (2)?

Thanks for hind but I already cleaned it up:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=068812ed108acbfe070b893faba9845fe2ea3fd9

Best regards,
Krzysztof

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web