Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1294302 > unrolled thread

linux-next: rebase of the drm-panel tree

Started byStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
First post2015-12-17 23:20 +0100
Last post2015-12-18 07:50 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  linux-next: rebase of the drm-panel tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2015-12-17 23:20 +0100
    Re: linux-next: rebase of the drm-panel tree Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> - 2015-12-18 07:50 +0100

#1294302 — linux-next: rebase of the drm-panel tree

FromStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date2015-12-17 23:20 +0100
Subjectlinux-next: rebase of the drm-panel tree
Message-ID<qGP3Y-5sI-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi Thierry,

I noticed that you have rebased the drm-panel tree today.  Unfortunately,
Dave merged the previous version of your tree :-(

So, now in linux-next today, we are going to have 2 copies of all theose
patches, plus at least 2 of the patches have beenm changed in you new
version so there will probably be conflicts.

Please either go back to the old version, or just rebase what you have
now on top of Dave's drm tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1294459

FromThierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Date2015-12-18 07:50 +0100
Message-ID<qGX1v-25a-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1294302

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 09:17:29AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
> 
> I noticed that you have rebased the drm-panel tree today.  Unfortunately,
> Dave merged the previous version of your tree :-(

And I had hoped to have been fast enough. Sorry for the mess.

> So, now in linux-next today, we are going to have 2 copies of all theose
> patches, plus at least 2 of the patches have beenm changed in you new
> version so there will probably be conflicts.

Yes, there were two changes (in two patches) which moved device tree
bindings from a deprecated location to the new one.

> Please either go back to the old version, or just rebase what you have
> now on top of Dave's drm tree.

I'll revert to the old version and apply the changes as a separate patch
on top.

Again, sorry for the inconvenience.

Thierry

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web