Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1293965 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 1/1] mac80211: improve the contiguous mask checking

Started byJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
First post2015-12-17 16:10 +0100
Last post2015-12-17 16:10 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 1/1] mac80211: improve the contiguous mask checking Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> - 2015-12-17 16:10 +0100

#1293965 — Re: [PATCH 1/1] mac80211: improve the contiguous mask checking

FromJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date2015-12-17 16:10 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1] mac80211: improve the contiguous mask checking
Message-ID<qGIlP-154-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 22:59 +0800, Zeng Zhaoxiu wrote:
> If the result of adding the first set bit to the mask is power of 2,
> the mask must be contiguous. "mask & -mask" can get the first set bit
> of mask gracefully.

> -		if (__ffs64(mask) + hweight64(mask) != fls64(mask))
> {
> +		inc = (mask & -mask);
> +		val = mask + inc;
> +		if ((val & (val - 1)) != 0) {
>  			/* not a contiguous mask ... not handled now! */

Hm. Ok, I can see how that would work, but it doesn't really seem like
much of an "improvement" to me? Surely I seem to need much more
thinking to understand this. There's no reason to optimise it either,
so why should we change it?

johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web