Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1291025 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86, ras: Add mcsafe_memcpy() function to recover from machine checks

Started byIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
First post2015-12-14 11:00 +0100
Last post2015-12-14 11:00 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86, ras: Add mcsafe_memcpy() function to recover  from machine checks Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-12-14 11:00 +0100

#1291025 — Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86, ras: Add mcsafe_memcpy() function to recover from machine checks

FromIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Date2015-12-14 11:00 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] x86, ras: Add mcsafe_memcpy() function to recover from machine checks
Message-ID<qFy5c-4ms-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
* Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:

> [ adding nvdimm folks ]
> 
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > * Luck, Tony <tony.luck@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 08:53:13AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >> > > +extern phys_addr_t mcsafe_memcpy(void *dst, const void __user *src,
> >> > > +                         unsigned size);
> >> >
> >> > So what's the longer term purpose, where will mcsafe_memcpy() be used?
> >>
> >> The initial plan is to use this for file systems backed by NVDIMMs. They will
> >> have a large amount of memory, and we have a practical recovery path - return
> >> -EIO just like legacy h/w.
> >>
> >> We can look for other places in the kernel where we read large amounts of memory
> >> and have some idea how to recover if the memory turns out to be bad.
> >
> > I see, that's sensible!
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >         Ingo
> 
> Is that an "Acked-by"?  I'd like to pull this plus Vishal's
> gendisk-badblocks patches into a unified libnvdimm-error-handling
> branch.  We're looking to have v4.5 able to avoid or survive nvdimm
> media errors through the pmem driver and DAX paths.

So there was some feedback for v2 as well - I'd like to see v3 before an Acked-by.

But yeah, this is progressing in the right direction, and I suspect it's a 
relatively urgent feature from an nvdimm POV?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web