Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1290744 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-12-14 00:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2015-12-14 12:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v3] spi: dts: sun4i: Add support for hardware-based wait time between words Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-12-14 00:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] spi: dts: sun4i: Add support for hardware-based wait time between words Marcus Weseloh <mweseloh42@gmail.com> - 2015-12-14 00:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] spi: dts: sun4i: Add support for hardware-based wait time between words Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-12-14 12:00 +0100
| From | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-14 00:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] spi: dts: sun4i: Add support for hardware-based wait time between words |
| Message-ID | <qFnWa-6m8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:04:11AM +0100, Marcus Weseloh wrote: > Adds a new property "spi-word-wait-ns" to the spi-bus binding that allows Please don't bury patches in reply to existing serieses, it makes it hard to follow what's going on with regard to which versions are current and so on.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marcus Weseloh <mweseloh42@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-14 00:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qFofw-6tv-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1290744 |
2015-12-14 0:08 GMT+01:00 Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>: > Please don't bury patches in reply to existing serieses, it makes it > hard to follow what's going on with regard to which versions are current > and so on. Thanks for the pointer, I will send patches like you ask from now on. Should I resend the patch? Cheers, Marcus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-14 12:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qFz1g-52w-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1290750 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:23:29AM +0100, Marcus Weseloh wrote: > Should I resend the patch? No, it's OK.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web