Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1291156 > unrolled thread

[RFC][PATCH] zram: drop partial_io support

Started bySergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
First post2015-12-14 13:50 +0100
Last post2015-12-16 02:30 +0100
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

Contents

  [RFC][PATCH] zram: drop partial_io support Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2015-12-14 13:50 +0100
    Re: [RFC][PATCH] zram: drop partial_io support Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2015-12-16 02:10 +0100
      Re: [RFC][PATCH] zram: drop partial_io support Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2015-12-16 02:30 +0100

#1291156 — [RFC][PATCH] zram: drop partial_io support

FromSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Date2015-12-14 13:50 +0100
Subject[RFC][PATCH] zram: drop partial_io support
Message-ID<qFAJH-6cU-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hello,

I've been thinking about this for some time, but didn't have a chance
to properly investigate so far. My question is: why do we even bother
with partial IO in zram?

We set zram->disk->queue->limits.discard_granularity to PAGE_SIZE,
just like the rest of queue configuration, e.g.
	blk_queue_physical_block_size(zram->disk->queue, PAGE_SIZE)
etc.

And it's only blk_queue_logical_block_size() that has !PAGE_SIZE
configuration (on systems where PAGE_SIZE != ZRAM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_SHIFT).


The only requirement enforced on blk_queue_logical_block_size() from
zram/zsmalloc side seems to be that it should be less than or equal
to ZS_MAX_ALLOC_SIZE, which is:
	#define ZS_MAX_ALLOC_SIZE	PAGE_SIZE


We talk to compressing backends with PAGE_SIZE-d buffers,
zsmalloc understands PAGE_SIZE allocations and we can simplify
things if we will be able to drop this partial IO support thing.
So why do we keep it?

What am I missing? Sorry if there is something obvious.


** NOT TESTED ON SYSTEMS WITH PAGE_SIZE OTHER THAN 4K **
Will try to do this later this week (well, if it makes sense).


===8<===8<===

From e55739c453c1ab01ab9b6ef734b078c1d96fbde2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 21:23:39 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] zram: drop partial_io handling

Not-yet-Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 99 ++++++-------------------------------------
 drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h |  3 +-
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
index 47915d7..9bb5e3b 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -106,11 +106,6 @@ static void zram_set_obj_size(struct zram_meta *meta,
 	meta->table[index].value = (flags << ZRAM_FLAG_SHIFT) | size;
 }
 
-static inline bool is_partial_io(struct bio_vec *bvec)
-{
-	return bvec->bv_len != PAGE_SIZE;
-}
-
 /*
  * Check if request is within bounds and aligned on zram logical blocks.
  */
@@ -178,10 +173,7 @@ static void handle_zero_page(struct bio_vec *bvec)
 	void *user_mem;
 
 	user_mem = kmap_atomic(page);
-	if (is_partial_io(bvec))
-		memset(user_mem + bvec->bv_offset, 0, bvec->bv_len);
-	else
-		clear_page(user_mem);
+	clear_page(user_mem);
 	kunmap_atomic(user_mem);
 
 	flush_dcache_page(page);
@@ -600,7 +592,7 @@ static int zram_bvec_read(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec,
 {
 	int ret;
 	struct page *page;
-	unsigned char *user_mem, *uncmem = NULL;
+	unsigned char *uncmem;
 	struct zram_meta *meta = zram->meta;
 	page = bvec->bv_page;
 
@@ -613,35 +605,16 @@ static int zram_bvec_read(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec,
 	}
 	bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
 
-	if (is_partial_io(bvec))
-		/* Use  a temporary buffer to decompress the page */
-		uncmem = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_NOIO);
-
-	user_mem = kmap_atomic(page);
-	if (!is_partial_io(bvec))
-		uncmem = user_mem;
-
-	if (!uncmem) {
-		pr_err("Unable to allocate temp memory\n");
-		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto out_cleanup;
-	}
-
+	uncmem = kmap_atomic(page);
 	ret = zram_decompress_page(zram, uncmem, index);
 	/* Should NEVER happen. Return bio error if it does. */
 	if (unlikely(ret))
 		goto out_cleanup;
 
-	if (is_partial_io(bvec))
-		memcpy(user_mem + bvec->bv_offset, uncmem + offset,
-				bvec->bv_len);
-
 	flush_dcache_page(page);
 	ret = 0;
 out_cleanup:
-	kunmap_atomic(user_mem);
-	if (is_partial_io(bvec))
-		kfree(uncmem);
+	kunmap_atomic(uncmem);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -652,42 +625,17 @@ static int zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index,
 	size_t clen;
 	unsigned long handle;
 	struct page *page;
-	unsigned char *user_mem, *cmem, *src, *uncmem = NULL;
+	unsigned char *user_mem, *cmem;
 	struct zram_meta *meta = zram->meta;
 	struct zcomp_strm *zstrm = NULL;
 	unsigned long alloced_pages;
 
 	page = bvec->bv_page;
-	if (is_partial_io(bvec)) {
-		/*
-		 * This is a partial IO. We need to read the full page
-		 * before to write the changes.
-		 */
-		uncmem = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_NOIO);
-		if (!uncmem) {
-			ret = -ENOMEM;
-			goto out;
-		}
-		ret = zram_decompress_page(zram, uncmem, index);
-		if (ret)
-			goto out;
-	}
-
 	zstrm = zcomp_strm_find(zram->comp);
 	user_mem = kmap_atomic(page);
 
-	if (is_partial_io(bvec)) {
-		memcpy(uncmem + offset, user_mem + bvec->bv_offset,
-		       bvec->bv_len);
+	if (page_zero_filled(user_mem)) {
 		kunmap_atomic(user_mem);
-		user_mem = NULL;
-	} else {
-		uncmem = user_mem;
-	}
-
-	if (page_zero_filled(uncmem)) {
-		if (user_mem)
-			kunmap_atomic(user_mem);
 		/* Free memory associated with this sector now. */
 		bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
 		zram_free_page(zram, index);
@@ -699,22 +647,15 @@ static int zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	ret = zcomp_compress(zram->comp, zstrm, uncmem, &clen);
-	if (!is_partial_io(bvec)) {
-		kunmap_atomic(user_mem);
-		user_mem = NULL;
-		uncmem = NULL;
-	}
+	ret = zcomp_compress(zram->comp, zstrm, user_mem, &clen);
+	kunmap_atomic(user_mem);
 
 	if (unlikely(ret)) {
 		pr_err("Compression failed! err=%d\n", ret);
 		goto out;
 	}
-	src = zstrm->buffer;
 	if (unlikely(clen > max_zpage_size)) {
 		clen = PAGE_SIZE;
-		if (is_partial_io(bvec))
-			src = uncmem;
 	}
 
 	handle = zs_malloc(meta->mem_pool, clen);
@@ -736,12 +677,12 @@ static int zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index,
 
 	cmem = zs_map_object(meta->mem_pool, handle, ZS_MM_WO);
 
-	if ((clen == PAGE_SIZE) && !is_partial_io(bvec)) {
-		src = kmap_atomic(page);
+	if (clen == PAGE_SIZE) {
+		unsigned char *src = kmap_atomic(page);
 		copy_page(cmem, src);
 		kunmap_atomic(src);
 	} else {
-		memcpy(cmem, src, clen);
+		memcpy(cmem, zstrm->buffer, clen);
 	}
 
 	zcomp_strm_release(zram->comp, zstrm);
@@ -765,8 +706,6 @@ static int zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index,
 out:
 	if (zstrm)
 		zcomp_strm_release(zram->comp, zstrm);
-	if (is_partial_io(bvec))
-		kfree(uncmem);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -1242,24 +1181,12 @@ static int zram_add(void)
 	 * and n*PAGE_SIZED sized I/O requests.
 	 */
 	blk_queue_physical_block_size(zram->disk->queue, PAGE_SIZE);
-	blk_queue_logical_block_size(zram->disk->queue,
-					ZRAM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_SIZE);
+	blk_queue_logical_block_size(zram->disk->queue, PAGE_SIZE);
 	blk_queue_io_min(zram->disk->queue, PAGE_SIZE);
 	blk_queue_io_opt(zram->disk->queue, PAGE_SIZE);
 	zram->disk->queue->limits.discard_granularity = PAGE_SIZE;
 	blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(zram->disk->queue, UINT_MAX);
-	/*
-	 * zram_bio_discard() will clear all logical blocks if logical block
-	 * size is identical with physical block size(PAGE_SIZE). But if it is
-	 * different, we will skip discarding some parts of logical blocks in
-	 * the part of the request range which isn't aligned to physical block
-	 * size.  So we can't ensure that all discarded logical blocks are
-	 * zeroed.
-	 */
-	if (ZRAM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_SIZE == PAGE_SIZE)
-		zram->disk->queue->limits.discard_zeroes_data = 1;
-	else
-		zram->disk->queue->limits.discard_zeroes_data = 0;
+	zram->disk->queue->limits.discard_zeroes_data = 1;
 	queue_flag_set_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, zram->disk->queue);
 
 	add_disk(zram->disk);
diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
index 9b296c4..0c89c6d 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
@@ -39,12 +39,11 @@ static const size_t max_zpage_size = PAGE_SIZE / 4 * 3;
 #define SECTOR_SHIFT		9
 #define SECTORS_PER_PAGE_SHIFT	(PAGE_SHIFT - SECTOR_SHIFT)
 #define SECTORS_PER_PAGE	(1 << SECTORS_PER_PAGE_SHIFT)
-#define ZRAM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_SHIFT 12
+#define ZRAM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_SHIFT	PAGE_SHIFT
 #define ZRAM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_SIZE	(1 << ZRAM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_SHIFT)
 #define ZRAM_SECTOR_PER_LOGICAL_BLOCK	\
 	(1 << (ZRAM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_SHIFT - SECTOR_SHIFT))
 
-
 /*
  * The lower ZRAM_FLAG_SHIFT bits of table.value is for
  * object size (excluding header), the higher bits is for
-- 
2.6.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1292685

FromMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Date2015-12-16 02:10 +0100
Message-ID<qG8Lo-3t6-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1291156
Hello Sergey,

Sorry for the late response. I am in long vavacation now but today,
I get small time to sit down on computer. :)

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 09:38:55PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I've been thinking about this for some time, but didn't have a chance
> to properly investigate so far. My question is: why do we even bother
> with partial IO in zram?

It was done before I involved zram actively so I should spend a time
to search the reason.
Firstly, author was Jerome.
http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2011/06/10/318

And Nitin wanted to increase logical block size 64K instead of
making complex part by partial I/O.
http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2011/06/10/402

And Jeff and Martin said there is no problem to increase
logical_block_size from unsigned short if people are aware of
the implications bigger blocks have on the filesystems they put on top.

http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2011/06/14/289
http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2011/06/14/324

Jerome finally found severe problem which FAT fs are unable to
cope with 64K logical blocks at least.
http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2011/07/01/196

That's why Nitin decided to suppport partial IO in zram.
And I think it does make sense.

Thanks.

> 
> We set zram->disk->queue->limits.discard_granularity to PAGE_SIZE,
> just like the rest of queue configuration, e.g.
> 	blk_queue_physical_block_size(zram->disk->queue, PAGE_SIZE)
> etc.
> 
> And it's only blk_queue_logical_block_size() that has !PAGE_SIZE
> configuration (on systems where PAGE_SIZE != ZRAM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_SHIFT).
> 
> 
> The only requirement enforced on blk_queue_logical_block_size() from
> zram/zsmalloc side seems to be that it should be less than or equal
> to ZS_MAX_ALLOC_SIZE, which is:
> 	#define ZS_MAX_ALLOC_SIZE	PAGE_SIZE
> 
> 
> We talk to compressing backends with PAGE_SIZE-d buffers,
> zsmalloc understands PAGE_SIZE allocations and we can simplify
> things if we will be able to drop this partial IO support thing.
> So why do we keep it?
> 
> What am I missing? Sorry if there is something obvious.
> 
> 
> ** NOT TESTED ON SYSTEMS WITH PAGE_SIZE OTHER THAN 4K **
> Will try to do this later this week (well, if it makes sense).
> 
> 
> ===8<===8<===
> 
> From e55739c453c1ab01ab9b6ef734b078c1d96fbde2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 21:23:39 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] zram: drop partial_io handling
> 
> Not-yet-Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 99 ++++++-------------------------------------
>  drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h |  3 +-
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> index 47915d7..9bb5e3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> @@ -106,11 +106,6 @@ static void zram_set_obj_size(struct zram_meta *meta,
>  	meta->table[index].value = (flags << ZRAM_FLAG_SHIFT) | size;
>  }
>  
> -static inline bool is_partial_io(struct bio_vec *bvec)
> -{
> -	return bvec->bv_len != PAGE_SIZE;
> -}
> -
>  /*
>   * Check if request is within bounds and aligned on zram logical blocks.
>   */
> @@ -178,10 +173,7 @@ static void handle_zero_page(struct bio_vec *bvec)
>  	void *user_mem;
>  
>  	user_mem = kmap_atomic(page);
> -	if (is_partial_io(bvec))
> -		memset(user_mem + bvec->bv_offset, 0, bvec->bv_len);
> -	else
> -		clear_page(user_mem);
> +	clear_page(user_mem);
>  	kunmap_atomic(user_mem);
>  
>  	flush_dcache_page(page);
> @@ -600,7 +592,7 @@ static int zram_bvec_read(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec,
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  	struct page *page;
> -	unsigned char *user_mem, *uncmem = NULL;
> +	unsigned char *uncmem;
>  	struct zram_meta *meta = zram->meta;
>  	page = bvec->bv_page;
>  
> @@ -613,35 +605,16 @@ static int zram_bvec_read(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec,
>  	}
>  	bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
>  
> -	if (is_partial_io(bvec))
> -		/* Use  a temporary buffer to decompress the page */
> -		uncmem = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_NOIO);
> -
> -	user_mem = kmap_atomic(page);
> -	if (!is_partial_io(bvec))
> -		uncmem = user_mem;
> -
> -	if (!uncmem) {
> -		pr_err("Unable to allocate temp memory\n");
> -		ret = -ENOMEM;
> -		goto out_cleanup;
> -	}
> -
> +	uncmem = kmap_atomic(page);
>  	ret = zram_decompress_page(zram, uncmem, index);
>  	/* Should NEVER happen. Return bio error if it does. */
>  	if (unlikely(ret))
>  		goto out_cleanup;
>  
> -	if (is_partial_io(bvec))
> -		memcpy(user_mem + bvec->bv_offset, uncmem + offset,
> -				bvec->bv_len);
> -
>  	flush_dcache_page(page);
>  	ret = 0;
>  out_cleanup:
> -	kunmap_atomic(user_mem);
> -	if (is_partial_io(bvec))
> -		kfree(uncmem);
> +	kunmap_atomic(uncmem);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -652,42 +625,17 @@ static int zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index,
>  	size_t clen;
>  	unsigned long handle;
>  	struct page *page;
> -	unsigned char *user_mem, *cmem, *src, *uncmem = NULL;
> +	unsigned char *user_mem, *cmem;
>  	struct zram_meta *meta = zram->meta;
>  	struct zcomp_strm *zstrm = NULL;
>  	unsigned long alloced_pages;
>  
>  	page = bvec->bv_page;
> -	if (is_partial_io(bvec)) {
> -		/*
> -		 * This is a partial IO. We need to read the full page
> -		 * before to write the changes.
> -		 */
> -		uncmem = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_NOIO);
> -		if (!uncmem) {
> -			ret = -ENOMEM;
> -			goto out;
> -		}
> -		ret = zram_decompress_page(zram, uncmem, index);
> -		if (ret)
> -			goto out;
> -	}
> -
>  	zstrm = zcomp_strm_find(zram->comp);
>  	user_mem = kmap_atomic(page);
>  
> -	if (is_partial_io(bvec)) {
> -		memcpy(uncmem + offset, user_mem + bvec->bv_offset,
> -		       bvec->bv_len);
> +	if (page_zero_filled(user_mem)) {
>  		kunmap_atomic(user_mem);
> -		user_mem = NULL;
> -	} else {
> -		uncmem = user_mem;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (page_zero_filled(uncmem)) {
> -		if (user_mem)
> -			kunmap_atomic(user_mem);
>  		/* Free memory associated with this sector now. */
>  		bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
>  		zram_free_page(zram, index);
> @@ -699,22 +647,15 @@ static int zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index,
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = zcomp_compress(zram->comp, zstrm, uncmem, &clen);
> -	if (!is_partial_io(bvec)) {
> -		kunmap_atomic(user_mem);
> -		user_mem = NULL;
> -		uncmem = NULL;
> -	}
> +	ret = zcomp_compress(zram->comp, zstrm, user_mem, &clen);
> +	kunmap_atomic(user_mem);
>  
>  	if (unlikely(ret)) {
>  		pr_err("Compression failed! err=%d\n", ret);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
> -	src = zstrm->buffer;
>  	if (unlikely(clen > max_zpage_size)) {
>  		clen = PAGE_SIZE;
> -		if (is_partial_io(bvec))
> -			src = uncmem;
>  	}
>  
>  	handle = zs_malloc(meta->mem_pool, clen);
> @@ -736,12 +677,12 @@ static int zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index,
>  
>  	cmem = zs_map_object(meta->mem_pool, handle, ZS_MM_WO);
>  
> -	if ((clen == PAGE_SIZE) && !is_partial_io(bvec)) {
> -		src = kmap_atomic(page);
> +	if (clen == PAGE_SIZE) {
> +		unsigned char *src = kmap_atomic(page);
>  		copy_page(cmem, src);
>  		kunmap_atomic(src);
>  	} else {
> -		memcpy(cmem, src, clen);
> +		memcpy(cmem, zstrm->buffer, clen);
>  	}
>  
>  	zcomp_strm_release(zram->comp, zstrm);
> @@ -765,8 +706,6 @@ static int zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index,
>  out:
>  	if (zstrm)
>  		zcomp_strm_release(zram->comp, zstrm);
> -	if (is_partial_io(bvec))
> -		kfree(uncmem);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1242,24 +1181,12 @@ static int zram_add(void)
>  	 * and n*PAGE_SIZED sized I/O requests.
>  	 */
>  	blk_queue_physical_block_size(zram->disk->queue, PAGE_SIZE);
> -	blk_queue_logical_block_size(zram->disk->queue,
> -					ZRAM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_SIZE);
> +	blk_queue_logical_block_size(zram->disk->queue, PAGE_SIZE);
>  	blk_queue_io_min(zram->disk->queue, PAGE_SIZE);
>  	blk_queue_io_opt(zram->disk->queue, PAGE_SIZE);
>  	zram->disk->queue->limits.discard_granularity = PAGE_SIZE;
>  	blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(zram->disk->queue, UINT_MAX);
> -	/*
> -	 * zram_bio_discard() will clear all logical blocks if logical block
> -	 * size is identical with physical block size(PAGE_SIZE). But if it is
> -	 * different, we will skip discarding some parts of logical blocks in
> -	 * the part of the request range which isn't aligned to physical block
> -	 * size.  So we can't ensure that all discarded logical blocks are
> -	 * zeroed.
> -	 */
> -	if (ZRAM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_SIZE == PAGE_SIZE)
> -		zram->disk->queue->limits.discard_zeroes_data = 1;
> -	else
> -		zram->disk->queue->limits.discard_zeroes_data = 0;
> +	zram->disk->queue->limits.discard_zeroes_data = 1;
>  	queue_flag_set_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, zram->disk->queue);
>  
>  	add_disk(zram->disk);
> diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
> index 9b296c4..0c89c6d 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
> @@ -39,12 +39,11 @@ static const size_t max_zpage_size = PAGE_SIZE / 4 * 3;
>  #define SECTOR_SHIFT		9
>  #define SECTORS_PER_PAGE_SHIFT	(PAGE_SHIFT - SECTOR_SHIFT)
>  #define SECTORS_PER_PAGE	(1 << SECTORS_PER_PAGE_SHIFT)
> -#define ZRAM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_SHIFT 12
> +#define ZRAM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_SHIFT	PAGE_SHIFT
>  #define ZRAM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_SIZE	(1 << ZRAM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_SHIFT)
>  #define ZRAM_SECTOR_PER_LOGICAL_BLOCK	\
>  	(1 << (ZRAM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_SHIFT - SECTOR_SHIFT))
>  
> -
>  /*
>   * The lower ZRAM_FLAG_SHIFT bits of table.value is for
>   * object size (excluding header), the higher bits is for
> -- 
> 2.6.4
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1292688

FromSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Date2015-12-16 02:30 +0100
Message-ID<qG94J-3zE-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1292685
Hello Minchan,

On (12/16/15 10:01), Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hello Sergey,
> 
> Sorry for the late response. I am in long vavacation now but today,
> I get small time to sit down on computer. :)

Have a good one!

> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 09:38:55PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I've been thinking about this for some time, but didn't have a chance
> > to properly investigate so far. My question is: why do we even bother
> > with partial IO in zram?
> 
> It was done before I involved zram actively so I should spend a time
> to search the reason.

Thanks a lot! I appreciate this. I was about to do the same but still
a bit too busy.

> Firstly, author was Jerome.
> http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2011/06/10/318
> 
> And Nitin wanted to increase logical block size 64K instead of
> making complex part by partial I/O.
> http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2011/06/10/402
> 
> And Jeff and Martin said there is no problem to increase
> logical_block_size from unsigned short if people are aware of
> the implications bigger blocks have on the filesystems they put on top.
> 
> http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2011/06/14/289
> http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2011/06/14/324
> 
> Jerome finally found severe problem which FAT fs are unable to
> cope with 64K logical blocks at least.
> http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2011/07/01/196
>
> That's why Nitin decided to suppport partial IO in zram.
> And I think it does make sense.

uhhh... ok, I see. Thanks.

	-ss
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web