Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1288566 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 1/4] gpio: pxa: convert to one gpiochip

Started byLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
First post2015-12-10 16:10 +0100
Last post2015-12-10 18:30 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 1/4] gpio: pxa: convert to one gpiochip Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2015-12-10 16:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/4] gpio: pxa: convert to one gpiochip Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> - 2015-12-10 18:30 +0100

#1288566 — Re: [PATCH 1/4] gpio: pxa: convert to one gpiochip

FromLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date2015-12-10 16:10 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] gpio: pxa: convert to one gpiochip
Message-ID<qEb11-7RF-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> wrote:

> The pxa gpio IP is provided by one chip, which holds multiple banks.
>
> Another reason the driver should register only one gpiochip instead of
> multiple gpiochips (ie. 1 per each bank) is that for pincontrol and
> devicetree integration (think gpio-ranges), it's impossible to have the
> contiguous pin range 0..127 mapped to gpios 0..127.
>
> This patch, amongst other thinks, paves the path to loosen the bond with
> the global structure variable pxa_gpio_chip.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>

Patch applied.

Since noone else seems to care, would you consider sending a patch
to MAINTAINERS listing yourself as maintainer of this GPIO driver?

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1288705

FromRobert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
Date2015-12-10 18:30 +0100
Message-ID<qEdcv-Km-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1288566
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> writes:

> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> wrote:
>
>> The pxa gpio IP is provided by one chip, which holds multiple banks.
>>
>> Another reason the driver should register only one gpiochip instead of
>> multiple gpiochips (ie. 1 per each bank) is that for pincontrol and
>> devicetree integration (think gpio-ranges), it's impossible to have the
>> contiguous pin range 0..127 mapped to gpios 0..127.
>>
>> This patch, amongst other thinks, paves the path to loosen the bond with
>> the global structure variable pxa_gpio_chip.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
>
> Patch applied.
>
> Since noone else seems to care, would you consider sending a patch
> to MAINTAINERS listing yourself as maintainer of this GPIO driver?
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij

But of course, I'll do it with pleasure right after work :)

Cheers.

-- 
Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web