Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1288546 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-12-10 16:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2015-12-10 18:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: gpio-mxc: gpiod_get_value returns INT_MIN when the GPIO is off Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2015-12-10 16:00 +0100
Re: gpio-mxc: gpiod_get_value returns INT_MIN when the GPIO is off Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com> - 2015-12-10 18:20 +0100
| From | Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-10 16:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: gpio-mxc: gpiod_get_value returns INT_MIN when the GPIO is off |
| Message-ID | <qEaRj-7yx-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Clemens Gruber
<clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com> wrote:
> I am writing a module which reads several GPIO input states from a
> Freescale i.MX6Q. I can control the input states through hardware
> buttons attached to my development board. They are all connected exactly
> the same, with external pull up resistors.
> I am using the current torvalds/linux master branch.
>
> The list in my DT looks like this:
> my-gpios = <&gpio1 7 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>,
> <&gpio1 8 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>,
> /* .... */
> <&gpio6 31 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>,
> <&gpio7 11 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
So IIUC this us using drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c, correct?
> In my platform driver module, I first call gpiod_get_array(dev, "my",
> GPIOD_IN);
>
> Then I can successfully read in the input states of my GPIOs and get
> "correct" values for all but one of them: GPIO6_31
> Meaning: When no button is pressed, every call to
> gpiod_get_value(my_gpios->desc[i]) returns 0 and if one of the buttons
> is pressed, it returns 1.
> Except for gpio6 31: It returns -2^31 (INT_MIN) when no button is
> pressed and 1 if a button is pressed.
>
> I double checked the pinmuxing and the hardware, the input state should
> be off / 0 and not -2^31. The internal pull up is also enabled.
> Muxing: fsl,pins = <MX6QDL_PAD_EIM_BCLK__GPIO6_IO31 0x1b099>;
>
> I read through the source of gpio-generic.c and came across
> bgpio_get_set. If I interpret the code correctly, it is set as the get
> function of the gpio chip. (because BGPIOF_READ_OUTPUT_REG_SET is passed
> as flags argument when bgpio_init is called from gpio-mxc.c)
> In the case of gpio6_31, the pin2mask function would return 1 << 31 as
> unsigned long, meaning 2^31 and then the unsigned long return value of
> read_reg is bitmasked with 2^31 which would result in 2^31 if it is on
> and 0 if it is off.
> But because gpiod_get_value returns an int, the 2^31 unsigned long is
> casted to a signed int, which means it returns -2^31 if it is active.
> But in this case, it returns -2^31 if it is inactive and 1 if it is
> active...
>
> I can workaround by checking gpiod_get_value(desc) == 1 but I'd really
> like to know what's causing this (odd?) behavior.
>
> Am I doing something wrong here?
No it looks like a bug to me, sadly I'm not really using generic GPIO
with any hardware enough. I cooked up the following patch, can you test
it (tell me if you want me to send it separately):
From 6e9a115f7a9f70fede21e63630e0d7b01661cf7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:55:29 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gpio: generic: clamp values from bgpio_get_set()
The bgpio_get_set() call should return a value clamped to [0,1],
the current code will return a negative value if reading
bit 31, which gets interpreted as an error by the gpiolib core.
Reported-by: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-generic.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-generic.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-generic.c
index 72088028d7a9..ea581dc23d44 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-generic.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-generic.c
@@ -141,9 +141,9 @@ static int bgpio_get_set(struct gpio_chip *gc,
unsigned int gpio)
unsigned long pinmask = bgc->pin2mask(bgc, gpio);
if (bgc->dir & pinmask)
- return bgc->read_reg(bgc->reg_set) & pinmask;
+ return !!(bgc->read_reg(bgc->reg_set) & pinmask);
else
- return bgc->read_reg(bgc->reg_dat) & pinmask;
+ return !!(bgc->read_reg(bgc->reg_dat) & pinmask);
}
static int bgpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio)
--
2.4.3
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-10 18:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qEd2O-GC-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1288546 |
Hi Linus, On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 03:58:39PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Clemens Gruber > <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com> wrote: > > > I am writing a module which reads several GPIO input states from a > > Freescale i.MX6Q. I can control the input states through hardware > > buttons attached to my development board. They are all connected exactly > > the same, with external pull up resistors. > > I am using the current torvalds/linux master branch. > > > > The list in my DT looks like this: > > my-gpios = <&gpio1 7 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>, > > <&gpio1 8 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>, > > /* .... */ > > <&gpio6 31 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>, > > <&gpio7 11 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; > > So IIUC this us using drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c, correct? Yes. > > > In my platform driver module, I first call gpiod_get_array(dev, "my", > > GPIOD_IN); > > > > Then I can successfully read in the input states of my GPIOs and get > > "correct" values for all but one of them: GPIO6_31 > > Meaning: When no button is pressed, every call to > > gpiod_get_value(my_gpios->desc[i]) returns 0 and if one of the buttons > > is pressed, it returns 1. > > Except for gpio6 31: It returns -2^31 (INT_MIN) when no button is > > pressed and 1 if a button is pressed. > > > > I double checked the pinmuxing and the hardware, the input state should > > be off / 0 and not -2^31. The internal pull up is also enabled. > > Muxing: fsl,pins = <MX6QDL_PAD_EIM_BCLK__GPIO6_IO31 0x1b099>; > > > > I read through the source of gpio-generic.c and came across > > bgpio_get_set. If I interpret the code correctly, it is set as the get > > function of the gpio chip. (because BGPIOF_READ_OUTPUT_REG_SET is passed > > as flags argument when bgpio_init is called from gpio-mxc.c) > > In the case of gpio6_31, the pin2mask function would return 1 << 31 as > > unsigned long, meaning 2^31 and then the unsigned long return value of > > read_reg is bitmasked with 2^31 which would result in 2^31 if it is on > > and 0 if it is off. > > But because gpiod_get_value returns an int, the 2^31 unsigned long is > > casted to a signed int, which means it returns -2^31 if it is active. > > But in this case, it returns -2^31 if it is inactive and 1 if it is > > active... > > > > I can workaround by checking gpiod_get_value(desc) == 1 but I'd really > > like to know what's causing this (odd?) behavior. > > > > Am I doing something wrong here? > > No it looks like a bug to me, sadly I'm not really using generic GPIO > with any hardware enough. I cooked up the following patch, can you test > it (tell me if you want me to send it separately): Thank you, your patch fixes the problem. Although I thought I tried something like this before and it did not work, your change works, so I probably messed something up back then. > > From 6e9a115f7a9f70fede21e63630e0d7b01661cf7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:55:29 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] gpio: generic: clamp values from bgpio_get_set() > > The bgpio_get_set() call should return a value clamped to [0,1], > the current code will return a negative value if reading > bit 31, which gets interpreted as an error by the gpiolib core. > > Reported-by: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/gpio/gpio-generic.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-generic.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-generic.c > index 72088028d7a9..ea581dc23d44 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-generic.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-generic.c > @@ -141,9 +141,9 @@ static int bgpio_get_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, > unsigned int gpio) > unsigned long pinmask = bgc->pin2mask(bgc, gpio); > > if (bgc->dir & pinmask) > - return bgc->read_reg(bgc->reg_set) & pinmask; > + return !!(bgc->read_reg(bgc->reg_set) & pinmask); > else > - return bgc->read_reg(bgc->reg_dat) & pinmask; > + return !!(bgc->read_reg(bgc->reg_dat) & pinmask); > } > > static int bgpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio) > -- > 2.4.3 > > Yours, > Linus Walleij Thanks, Clemens -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web