Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1280111 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: nsp: add pinmux driver support for Broadcom NSP SoC

Started byRay Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
First post2015-11-30 18:10 +0100
Last post2015-12-11 00:00 +0100
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: nsp: add pinmux driver support for Broadcom  NSP SoC Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com> - 2015-11-30 18:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: nsp: add pinmux driver support for Broadcom  NSP SoC Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2015-12-10 18:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: nsp: add pinmux driver support for Broadcom  NSP SoC Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com> - 2015-12-11 00:00 +0100

#1280111 — Re: [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: nsp: add pinmux driver support for Broadcom NSP SoC

FromRay Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
Date2015-11-30 18:10 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: nsp: add pinmux driver support for Broadcom NSP SoC
Message-ID<qAA7D-6si-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi Linus,

On 11/30/2015 4:49 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy
> <yrdreddy@broadcom.com> wrote:
>
>> This adds the initial support of the Broadcom NSP pinmux driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy <yrdreddy@broadcom.com>
>
> So what does Ray and Stephen say about this?
>
> Is the hardware unique enough to warrant its own driver?
>
> Or should it utilize/extend one of the existing Broadcom
> drivers?

Currently, the IOMUX configurations in Cygnus, NSP, and NS2 are 
completely different and require a separate driver to each of these 
SoCs. We now realize the shortcomings and have been communicating with 
our ASIC team. We'd like to fix this for the next-gen of our SoC. We are 
driving towards using a register layout that will allow us to use just 
"pinctrl-single" and "pinconf-single."

>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>

Thanks,

Ray
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1288671

FromLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date2015-12-10 18:00 +0100
Message-ID<qEcJs-k8-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1280111
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com> wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> On 11/30/2015 4:49 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy
>> <yrdreddy@broadcom.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This adds the initial support of the Broadcom NSP pinmux driver.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy <yrdreddy@broadcom.com>
>>
>>
>> So what does Ray and Stephen say about this?
>>
>> Is the hardware unique enough to warrant its own driver?
>>
>> Or should it utilize/extend one of the existing Broadcom
>> drivers?
>
>
> Currently, the IOMUX configurations in Cygnus, NSP, and NS2 are completely
> different and require a separate driver to each of these SoCs. We now
> realize the shortcomings and have been communicating with our ASIC team.
> We'd like to fix this for the next-gen of our SoC. We are driving towards
> using a register layout that will allow us to use just "pinctrl-single" and
> "pinconf-single."

OK can you provide your reviews for the NSP driver?

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1288990

FromRay Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
Date2015-12-11 00:00 +0100
Message-ID<qEilQ-432-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1288671
Hi Linus,

On 12/10/2015 8:50 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com> wrote:
>> Hi Linus,
>>
>> On 11/30/2015 4:49 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy
>>> <yrdreddy@broadcom.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This adds the initial support of the Broadcom NSP pinmux driver.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy <yrdreddy@broadcom.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> So what does Ray and Stephen say about this?
>>>
>>> Is the hardware unique enough to warrant its own driver?
>>>
>>> Or should it utilize/extend one of the existing Broadcom
>>> drivers?
>>
>>
>> Currently, the IOMUX configurations in Cygnus, NSP, and NS2 are completely
>> different and require a separate driver to each of these SoCs. We now
>> realize the shortcomings and have been communicating with our ASIC team.
>> We'd like to fix this for the next-gen of our SoC. We are driving towards
>> using a register layout that will allow us to use just "pinctrl-single" and
>> "pinconf-single."
>
> OK can you provide your reviews for the NSP driver?
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>

Yes, I just replied to the email thread with my "Reviewed-by". In fact, 
both Scott and I reviewed the patches internally in Broadcom before they 
went out to public.

Thanks,

Ray
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web