Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1286841 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-12-08 21:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2015-12-09 20:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
x86 fpu: command-line parameters broken post-FPU-rewrite Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> - 2015-12-08 21:50 +0100
Re: x86 fpu: command-line parameters broken post-FPU-rewrite Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-12-09 09:40 +0100
Re: x86 fpu: command-line parameters broken post-FPU-rewrite Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2015-12-09 20:20 +0100
| From | Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-08 21:50 +0100 |
| Subject | x86 fpu: command-line parameters broken post-FPU-rewrite |
| Message-ID | <qDxmV-78r-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hey Ingo, We were starting to look at reenabling XSAVES support and tried to use the 'noxsave' and 'noxsaves' kernel command-line options. The rewrite moved the FPU initialization to before we even are parsing command-line options, even the early_param()s. Do you have any preferences on how it gets fixed? The most obvious thing would be to just defer as much of the FPU setup as we can until after parse_early_param() has happened. The only other think I can think of doing would be to try to do some *really* early, simple, command-line parsing to look for 'noxsave' and friends. Thoughts? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-09 09:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qDIs1-5V9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1286841 |
* Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> wrote: > Hey Ingo, > > We were starting to look at reenabling XSAVES support and tried to use the > 'noxsave' and 'noxsaves' kernel command-line options. The rewrite moved the FPU > initialization to before we even are parsing command-line options, even the > early_param()s. > > Do you have any preferences on how it gets fixed? > > The most obvious thing would be to just defer as much of the FPU setup as we can > until after parse_early_param() has happened. The only other think I can think > of doing would be to try to do some *really* early, simple, command-line parsing > to look for 'noxsave' and friends. > > Thoughts? Hm, so given that having the FPU operational is key to a functioning kernel (and other kernel subsystems may make use of FPU functionality), I'd rather bring option parsing earlier than change the FPU setup sequence. FPU setup should be done when we identify the CPU - not 'very late' as we used to. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-09 20:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qDSrp-42H-35@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1287191 |
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 09:32:10AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey Ingo,
> >
> > We were starting to look at reenabling XSAVES support and tried to use the
> > 'noxsave' and 'noxsaves' kernel command-line options. The rewrite moved the FPU
> > initialization to before we even are parsing command-line options, even the
> > early_param()s.
> >
> > Do you have any preferences on how it gets fixed?
> >
> > The most obvious thing would be to just defer as much of the FPU setup as we can
> > until after parse_early_param() has happened. The only other think I can think
> > of doing would be to try to do some *really* early, simple, command-line parsing
> > to look for 'noxsave' and friends.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> Hm, so given that having the FPU operational is key to a functioning kernel (and
> other kernel subsystems may make use of FPU functionality), I'd rather bring
> option parsing earlier than change the FPU setup sequence. FPU setup should be
> done when we identify the CPU - not 'very late' as we used to.
We already have early cmdline parsing: arch/x86/lib/cmdline.c
See users for examples.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web