Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1284532 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] MADV_FREE support

Started byPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
First post2015-12-05 12:20 +0100
Last post2015-12-05 17:00 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] MADV_FREE support Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2015-12-05 12:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] MADV_FREE support Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com> - 2015-12-05 17:00 +0100

#1284532 — Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] MADV_FREE support

FromPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date2015-12-05 12:20 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 00/13] MADV_FREE support
Message-ID<qCj2F-kX-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Wed 2015-11-04 10:25:54, Minchan Kim wrote:
> MADV_FREE is on linux-next so long time. The reason was two, I think.
> 
> 1. MADV_FREE code on reclaim path was really mess.

Could you explain what MADV_FREE does?

Comment in code says 'free the page only when there's memory
pressure'. So I mark my caches MADV_FREE, no memory pressure, I can
keep using it? And if there's memory pressure, what happens? I get
zeros? SIGSEGV?

Thanks,
								Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1284566

FromDaniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>
Date2015-12-05 17:00 +0100
Message-ID<qCnpD-2Wd-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1284532

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 05/12/15 06:10 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2015-11-04 10:25:54, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> MADV_FREE is on linux-next so long time. The reason was two, I think.
>>
>> 1. MADV_FREE code on reclaim path was really mess.
> 
> Could you explain what MADV_FREE does?
> 
> Comment in code says 'free the page only when there's memory
> pressure'. So I mark my caches MADV_FREE, no memory pressure, I can
> keep using it? And if there's memory pressure, what happens? I get
> zeros? SIGSEGV?

You get zeroes. It's not designed for that use case right now. It's for
malloc implementations to use internally. There would need to be a new
feature like MADV_FREE_UNDO for it to be usable for caches and it may
make more sense for that to be a separate feature entirely, i.e. have a
different flag for marking too (not sure) since it wouldn't need to
worry about whether stuff is touched.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web