Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1284317 > unrolled thread

NFS issue on v4.4-rc3

Started byLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
First post2015-12-05 00:00 +0100
Last post2015-12-05 00:00 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  NFS issue on v4.4-rc3 Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> - 2015-12-05 00:00 +0100

#1284317 — NFS issue on v4.4-rc3

FromLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Date2015-12-05 00:00 +0100
SubjectNFS issue on v4.4-rc3
Message-ID<qC7uy-ox-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hello,

I ran into the following warning when running v4.4-rc3 on a TI OMAP4 
(pandaboard) using nfsroot.

[ 8063.208526] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 8063.213653] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 81 at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:155 
inet_sock_destruct+0x188/0x1dc()
[ 8063.213653] Modules linked in: vivid cfbfillrect cfbimgblt font 
videobuf2_dma_contig videobuf2_memops cfbcopyarea videobuf2_v4l2 
videobuf2_core fb omapdrm drm_kms_helper drm snd_soc_omap_abe_twl6040 e
[ 8063.253143] CPU: 1 PID: 81 Comm: kworker/1:1H Not tainted 4.4.0-rc3-00249-
g8555fa61a7ca-dirty #347
[ 8063.269317] Hardware name: Generic OMAP4 (Flattened Device Tree)
[ 8063.275634] Workqueue: rpciod xprt_autoclose
[ 8063.275634] [<c0016f4c>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0013238>] 
(show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[ 8063.288391] [<c0013238>] (show_stack) from [<c0341e68>] 
(dump_stack+0x80/0x9c)
[ 8063.296020] [<c0341e68>] (dump_stack) from [<c003c458>] 
(warn_slowpath_common+0x7c/0xb8)
[ 8063.296020] [<c003c458>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c003c4b0>] 
(warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24)
[ 8063.313812] [<c003c4b0>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c05f4c18>] 
(inet_sock_destruct+0x188/0x1dc)
[ 8063.323059] [<c05f4c18>] (inet_sock_destruct) from [<c05679f8>] 
(sk_destruct+0x18/0x174)
[ 8063.331604] [<c05679f8>] (sk_destruct) from [<c05f4974>] 
(inet_release+0x44/0x70)
[ 8063.339508] [<c05f4974>] (inet_release) from [<c056167c>] 
(sock_release+0x20/0xb8)
[ 8063.347503] [<c056167c>] (sock_release) from [<c063ebac>] 
(xs_close+0xc/0x20)
[ 8063.355041] [<c063ebac>] (xs_close) from [<c063c0d4>] 
(xprt_autoclose+0x30/0x64)
[ 8063.362854] [<c063c0d4>] (xprt_autoclose) from [<c00559c4>] 
(process_one_work+0x1b4/0x4ac)
[ 8063.371551] [<c00559c4>] (process_one_work) from [<c0055e44>] 
(worker_thread+0x154/0x470)
[ 8063.380187] [<c0055e44>] (worker_thread) from [<c005bb88>] 
(kthread+0xd0/0xec)
[ 8063.387817] [<c005bb88>] (kthread) from [<c000f870>] 
(ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24)
[ 8063.395446] ---[ end trace 6ced06624a647c32 ]---

The problem occurred twice only over several hours and wasn't linked to any 
particular operation.

Before the first occurrence I also got errors printed right after boot on both 
the client and the server side kernel logs. The server side read as follows.

[72948.929645] oversized read request from 192.168.1.254, port=938 (1426618135 
bytes)
[72954.726793] oversized read request from 192.168.1.254, port=938 (67248960 
bytes)

I'm afraid the client messages have been lost in my scroll buffer, but they 
were related to the to oversized requests as well.

I've been running the same setup on v4.3 without any issue for quite a long 
time.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web