Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1281899 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 1/2] mm/page_alloc.c: use list_{first,last}_entry instead of list_entry

Started byGeliang Tang <geliangtang@163.com>
First post2015-12-02 16:20 +0100
Last post2015-12-03 02:30 +0100
Articles 4 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH 1/2] mm/page_alloc.c: use list_{first,last}_entry instead of list_entry Geliang Tang <geliangtang@163.com> - 2015-12-02 16:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/page_alloc.c: use list_{first,last}_entry instead  of list_entry Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-12-02 17:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/page_alloc.c: use list_{first,last}_entry instead  of list_entry Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> - 2015-12-02 17:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/page_alloc.c: use list_{first,last}_entry instead  of list_entry David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> - 2015-12-03 02:30 +0100

#1281899 — [PATCH 1/2] mm/page_alloc.c: use list_{first,last}_entry instead of list_entry

FromGeliang Tang <geliangtang@163.com>
Date2015-12-02 16:20 +0100
Subject[PATCH 1/2] mm/page_alloc.c: use list_{first,last}_entry instead of list_entry
Message-ID<qBhmh-sK-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
To make the intention clearer, use list_{first,last}_entry instead
of list_entry.

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@163.com>
---
 mm/page_alloc.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index d6d7c97..0d38185 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ static void free_pcppages_bulk(struct zone *zone, int count,
 		do {
 			int mt;	/* migratetype of the to-be-freed page */
 
-			page = list_entry(list->prev, struct page, lru);
+			page = list_last_entry(list, struct page, lru);
 			/* must delete as __free_one_page list manipulates */
 			list_del(&page->lru);
 
@@ -1457,11 +1457,10 @@ struct page *__rmqueue_smallest(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
 	/* Find a page of the appropriate size in the preferred list */
 	for (current_order = order; current_order < MAX_ORDER; ++current_order) {
 		area = &(zone->free_area[current_order]);
-		if (list_empty(&area->free_list[migratetype]))
-			continue;
-
-		page = list_entry(area->free_list[migratetype].next,
+		page = list_first_entry_or_null(&area->free_list[migratetype],
 							struct page, lru);
+		if (!page)
+			continue;
 		list_del(&page->lru);
 		rmv_page_order(page);
 		area->nr_free--;
@@ -1740,12 +1739,12 @@ static void unreserve_highatomic_pageblock(const struct alloc_context *ac)
 		for (order = 0; order < MAX_ORDER; order++) {
 			struct free_area *area = &(zone->free_area[order]);
 
-			if (list_empty(&area->free_list[MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC]))
+			page = list_first_entry_or_null(
+					&area->free_list[MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC],
+					struct page, lru);
+			if (!page)
 				continue;
 
-			page = list_entry(area->free_list[MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC].next,
-						struct page, lru);
-
 			/*
 			 * It should never happen but changes to locking could
 			 * inadvertently allow a per-cpu drain to add pages
@@ -1793,7 +1792,7 @@ __rmqueue_fallback(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order, int start_migratetype)
 		if (fallback_mt == -1)
 			continue;
 
-		page = list_entry(area->free_list[fallback_mt].next,
+		page = list_first_entry(&area->free_list[fallback_mt],
 						struct page, lru);
 		if (can_steal)
 			steal_suitable_fallback(zone, page, start_migratetype);
@@ -2252,9 +2251,9 @@ struct page *buffered_rmqueue(struct zone *preferred_zone,
 		}
 
 		if (cold)
-			page = list_entry(list->prev, struct page, lru);
+			page = list_last_entry(list, struct page, lru);
 		else
-			page = list_entry(list->next, struct page, lru);
+			page = list_first_entry(list, struct page, lru);
 
 		list_del(&page->lru);
 		pcp->count--;
-- 
2.5.0


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1281977 — Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/page_alloc.c: use list_{first,last}_entry instead of list_entry

FromMichal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Date2015-12-02 17:30 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] mm/page_alloc.c: use list_{first,last}_entry instead of list_entry
Message-ID<qBis3-19N-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1281899
On Wed 02-12-15 23:12:40, Geliang Tang wrote:
> To make the intention clearer, use list_{first,last}_entry instead
> of list_entry.

I like list_{first,last}_entry that indeed helps readability, the
_or_null is less clear from the name, though. Previous check for an
empty list was easier to read, at least for me. But it seems like
this is a general pattern...

> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@163.com>

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>

> ---
>  mm/page_alloc.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index d6d7c97..0d38185 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ static void free_pcppages_bulk(struct zone *zone, int count,
>  		do {
>  			int mt;	/* migratetype of the to-be-freed page */
>  
> -			page = list_entry(list->prev, struct page, lru);
> +			page = list_last_entry(list, struct page, lru);
>  			/* must delete as __free_one_page list manipulates */
>  			list_del(&page->lru);
>  
> @@ -1457,11 +1457,10 @@ struct page *__rmqueue_smallest(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
>  	/* Find a page of the appropriate size in the preferred list */
>  	for (current_order = order; current_order < MAX_ORDER; ++current_order) {
>  		area = &(zone->free_area[current_order]);
> -		if (list_empty(&area->free_list[migratetype]))
> -			continue;
> -
> -		page = list_entry(area->free_list[migratetype].next,
> +		page = list_first_entry_or_null(&area->free_list[migratetype],
>  							struct page, lru);
> +		if (!page)
> +			continue;
>  		list_del(&page->lru);
>  		rmv_page_order(page);
>  		area->nr_free--;
> @@ -1740,12 +1739,12 @@ static void unreserve_highatomic_pageblock(const struct alloc_context *ac)
>  		for (order = 0; order < MAX_ORDER; order++) {
>  			struct free_area *area = &(zone->free_area[order]);
>  
> -			if (list_empty(&area->free_list[MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC]))
> +			page = list_first_entry_or_null(
> +					&area->free_list[MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC],
> +					struct page, lru);
> +			if (!page)
>  				continue;
>  
> -			page = list_entry(area->free_list[MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC].next,
> -						struct page, lru);
> -
>  			/*
>  			 * It should never happen but changes to locking could
>  			 * inadvertently allow a per-cpu drain to add pages
> @@ -1793,7 +1792,7 @@ __rmqueue_fallback(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order, int start_migratetype)
>  		if (fallback_mt == -1)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		page = list_entry(area->free_list[fallback_mt].next,
> +		page = list_first_entry(&area->free_list[fallback_mt],
>  						struct page, lru);
>  		if (can_steal)
>  			steal_suitable_fallback(zone, page, start_migratetype);
> @@ -2252,9 +2251,9 @@ struct page *buffered_rmqueue(struct zone *preferred_zone,
>  		}
>  
>  		if (cold)
> -			page = list_entry(list->prev, struct page, lru);
> +			page = list_last_entry(list, struct page, lru);
>  		else
> -			page = list_entry(list->next, struct page, lru);
> +			page = list_first_entry(list, struct page, lru);
>  
>  		list_del(&page->lru);
>  		pcp->count--;
> -- 
> 2.5.0
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1282008 — Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/page_alloc.c: use list_{first,last}_entry instead of list_entry

FromMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Date2015-12-02 17:50 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] mm/page_alloc.c: use list_{first,last}_entry instead of list_entry
Message-ID<qBiLp-1hG-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1281899
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:12:40PM +0800, Geliang Tang wrote:
> To make the intention clearer, use list_{first,last}_entry instead
> of list_entry.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@163.com>

Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1282636 — Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/page_alloc.c: use list_{first,last}_entry instead of list_entry

FromDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Date2015-12-03 02:30 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] mm/page_alloc.c: use list_{first,last}_entry instead of list_entry
Message-ID<qBqSC-6Bi-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1281899
On Wed, 2 Dec 2015, Geliang Tang wrote:

> To make the intention clearer, use list_{first,last}_entry instead
> of list_entry.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@163.com>

Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web