Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1281882 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-12-02 16:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2015-12-02 16:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH 1/3] drivers: memory: clean up section counting Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net> - 2015-12-02 16:10 +0100
[PATCH 2/3] drivers: memory: rename remove_memory_block() to remove_memory_section() Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net> - 2015-12-02 16:10 +0100
| From | Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-02 16:10 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH 1/3] drivers: memory: clean up section counting |
| Message-ID | <qBhcB-nj-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Right now, section_count is calculated in add_memory_block(). However, init_memory_block() increments section_count as well, which, at first, seems like it would lead to an off-by-one error. There is no harm done because add_memory_block() immediately overwrites the mem->section_count, but it is messy. This commit moves the increment out of the common init_memory_block() (called by both add_memory_block() and register_new_memory()) and adds it to register_new_memory(). Signed-off-by: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net> --- drivers/base/memory.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c index 2804aed..ca2ce02 100644 --- a/drivers/base/memory.c +++ b/drivers/base/memory.c @@ -614,7 +614,6 @@ static int init_memory_block(struct memory_block **memory, base_memory_block_id(scn_nr) * sections_per_block; mem->end_section_nr = mem->start_section_nr + sections_per_block - 1; mem->state = state; - mem->section_count++; start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem->start_section_nr); mem->phys_device = arch_get_memory_phys_device(start_pfn); @@ -668,6 +667,7 @@ int register_new_memory(int nid, struct mem_section *section) ret = init_memory_block(&mem, section, MEM_OFFLINE); if (ret) goto out; + mem->section_count++; } if (mem->section_count == sections_per_block) -- 2.5.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-02 16:10 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH 2/3] drivers: memory: rename remove_memory_block() to remove_memory_section() |
| Message-ID | <qBhcC-nj-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1281882 |
The function removes a section, not a block. Rename to reflect
actual functionality.
Signed-off-by: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
---
drivers/base/memory.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c
index ca2ce02..dd30744 100644
--- a/drivers/base/memory.c
+++ b/drivers/base/memory.c
@@ -688,7 +688,7 @@ unregister_memory(struct memory_block *memory)
device_unregister(&memory->dev);
}
-static int remove_memory_block(unsigned long node_id,
+static int remove_memory_section(unsigned long node_id,
struct mem_section *section, int phys_device)
{
struct memory_block *mem;
@@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ int unregister_memory_section(struct mem_section *section)
if (!present_section(section))
return -EINVAL;
- return remove_memory_block(0, section, 0);
+ return remove_memory_section(0, section, 0);
}
#endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE */
--
2.5.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web