Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1283354 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Scotty Bauer <sbauer@eng.utah.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-12-03 22:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2015-12-04 01:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
Accessing user-land memory without safe functions Scotty Bauer <sbauer@eng.utah.edu> - 2015-12-03 22:00 +0100
Re: Accessing user-land memory without safe functions Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> - 2015-12-04 01:20 +0100
Re: Accessing user-land memory without safe functions Scotty Bauer <sbauer@eng.utah.edu> - 2015-12-04 01:40 +0100
| From | Scotty Bauer <sbauer@eng.utah.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-03 22:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Accessing user-land memory without safe functions |
| Message-ID | <qBJ8U-1Cs-79@gated-at.bofh.it> |
I Have been auditing a few drivers and have found some of them are
accessing user-land memory without either mapping the pages in, or
copying the data via the safe user access apis.
The thing I have mostly been seeing is something along the lines of:
ioctl(etc, etc, arg) {
char buf[32];
__user *some_struct = (type cast) arg;
size_t amount = some_struct->amount;
** do size check on amount **
copy_from_user(buf, some_struct->some_uland_addr, amount);
}
Above you see 2 unsafe user-land dereferences, the
some_struct->amount and some_struct->some_uland_addr.
Since I've seen this a couple times now I'm wondering if my
understanding of touching user-land memory is flawed.
For the above example Ioctl, the proper way to get access to those fields
through the safe copy_from_user or get_user() functions, correct?
I'm wondering if I should submit patches to fix the issues I've found,
but now I'm doubting whether they're really issues at all.
Thanks,
Scotty
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-04 01:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qBMgp-3Ms-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1283354 |
On Thu, 3 Dec 2015 13:54:30 -0700 Scotty Bauer <sbauer@eng.utah.edu> wrote: > Since I've seen this a couple times now I'm wondering if my > understanding of touching user-land memory is flawed. > > For the above example Ioctl, the proper way to get access to those fields > through the safe copy_from_user or get_user() functions, correct? > > I'm wondering if I should submit patches to fix the issues I've found, > but now I'm doubting whether they're really issues at all. They sound like bugs to me, though it would be easier to say for sure with a pointer to a specific function in the kernel source. Please point something out, or, perhaps better, send a patch fixing one of them. Thanks, jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Scotty Bauer <sbauer@eng.utah.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-04 01:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qBMzM-3Te-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1283471 |
Hi Jon, Thanks for the response. Here is one such example, although benign due to the function being called with CAP_SYS_ADMIN. I'll work on patches for some of the other issues and send those soon as well. https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/1/566 On 12/03/2015 05:12 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Thu, 3 Dec 2015 13:54:30 -0700 > Scotty Bauer <sbauer@eng.utah.edu> wrote: > >> Since I've seen this a couple times now I'm wondering if my >> understanding of touching user-land memory is flawed. >> >> For the above example Ioctl, the proper way to get access to those fields >> through the safe copy_from_user or get_user() functions, correct? >> >> I'm wondering if I should submit patches to fix the issues I've found, >> but now I'm doubting whether they're really issues at all. > > They sound like bugs to me, though it would be easier to say for sure with > a pointer to a specific function in the kernel source. Please point > something out, or, perhaps better, send a patch fixing one of them. > > Thanks, > > jon > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web