Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1281436 > unrolled thread

[v2] ath6kl: Use vmalloc to allocate ar->fw for api1 method

Started byBrent Taylor <motobud@gmail.com>
First post2015-12-02 05:20 +0100
Last post2015-12-02 14:30 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [v2] ath6kl: Use vmalloc to allocate ar->fw for api1 method Brent Taylor <motobud@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 05:20 +0100
    Re: [v2] ath6kl: Use vmalloc to allocate ar->fw for api1 method Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 14:30 +0100

#1281436 — [v2] ath6kl: Use vmalloc to allocate ar->fw for api1 method

FromBrent Taylor <motobud@gmail.com>
Date2015-12-02 05:20 +0100
Subject[v2] ath6kl: Use vmalloc to allocate ar->fw for api1 method
Message-ID<qB73z-2eK-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Since commit 8437754c8335 ("ath6kl: Use vmalloc instead of kmalloc for
fw") ar->fw is expected to be pointing to memory allocated by vmalloc.
If the api1 method (via ath6kl_fetch_fw_api1) is used to allocate memory
for ar->fw, then kmemdup is used.  This patch checks if the firmware being
loaded is the 'fw' image, then use vmalloc, otherwise use kmalloc.

Signed-off-by: Brent Taylor <motobud@gmail.com>
---
v2: Fix commit message and code formatting (use tab instaed of spaces)

 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/init.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/init.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/init.c
index 6ae0734..4f16bd8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/init.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/init.c
@@ -673,10 +673,15 @@ static int ath6kl_get_fw(struct ath6kl *ar, const char *filename,
 		return ret;
 
 	*fw_len = fw_entry->size;
-	*fw = kmemdup(fw_entry->data, fw_entry->size, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (&ar->fw == fw)
+		*fw = vmalloc(fw_entry->size);
+	else
+		*fw = kmalloc(fw_entry->size, GFP_KERNEL);
 
 	if (*fw == NULL)
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
+	else
+		memcpy(*fw, fw_entry->data, fw_entry->size);
 
 	release_firmware(fw_entry);
 
-- 
2.6.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1281777

FromEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date2015-12-02 14:30 +0100
Message-ID<qBfDP-7IL-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1281436
On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 22:18 -0600, Brent Taylor wrote:
> Since commit 8437754c8335 ("ath6kl: Use vmalloc instead of kmalloc for
> fw") ar->fw is expected to be pointing to memory allocated by vmalloc.
> If the api1 method (via ath6kl_fetch_fw_api1) is used to allocate memory
> for ar->fw, then kmemdup is used.  This patch checks if the firmware being
> loaded is the 'fw' image, then use vmalloc, otherwise use kmalloc.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brent Taylor <motobud@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2: Fix commit message and code formatting (use tab instaed of spaces)
> 
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/init.c | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/init.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/init.c
> index 6ae0734..4f16bd8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/init.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/init.c
> @@ -673,10 +673,15 @@ static int ath6kl_get_fw(struct ath6kl *ar, const char *filename,
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	*fw_len = fw_entry->size;
> -	*fw = kmemdup(fw_entry->data, fw_entry->size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (&ar->fw == fw)
> +		*fw = vmalloc(fw_entry->size);
> +	else
> +		*fw = kmalloc(fw_entry->size, GFP_KERNEL);
>  
>  	if (*fw == NULL)
>  		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +	else
> +		memcpy(*fw, fw_entry->data, fw_entry->size);
>  
>  	release_firmware(fw_entry);
>  

This looks very odd.

Why not using kvfree() in ath6kl_core_cleanup() ?

If you switch to vmalloc() here because the kmemdup() was potentially
failing, then the changelog should say it !

Using vmalloc() instead of kmalloc() should be driven by the allocation
size, not the legacy code doing the freeing.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web