Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1281031 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v2] hid: usbhid: hid-core: fix recursive deadlock

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH v2] hid: usbhid: hid-core: fix recursive deadlock Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2015-12-01 17:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v2] hid: usbhid: hid-core: fix recursive deadlock Ping Cheng <pinglinux@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 01:10 +0100

#1281031 — Re: [PATCH v2] hid: usbhid: hid-core: fix recursive deadlock

On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, Ioan-Adrian Ratiu wrote:

> The critical section protected by usbhid->lock in hid_ctrl() is too
> big and because of this it causes a recursive deadlock. "Too big" means
> the case statement and the call to hid_input_report() do not need to be
> protected by the spinlock (no URB operations are done inside them).
> 
> The deadlock happens because in certain rare cases drivers try to grab
> the lock while handling the ctrl irq which grabs the lock before them
> as described above. For example newer wacom tablets like 056a:033c try
> to reschedule proximity reads from wacom_intuos_schedule_prox_event()
> calling hid_hw_request() -> usbhid_request() -> usbhid_submit_report()
> which tries to grab the usbhid lock already held by hid_ctrl().
> 
> There are two ways to get out of this deadlock:
>     1. Make the drivers work "around" the ctrl critical region, in the
>     wacom case for ex. by delaying the scheduling of the proximity read
>     request itself to a workqueue.
>     2. Shrink the critical region so the usbhid lock protects only the
>     instructions which modify usbhid state, calling hid_input_report()
>     with the spinlock unlocked, allowing the device driver to grab the
>     lock first, finish and then grab the lock afterwards in hid_ctrl().
> 
> This patch implements the 2nd solution.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ioan-Adrian Ratiu <adi@adirat.com>

Applied to for-4.5/core branch. Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1281366

Hi Jiri,

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, Ioan-Adrian Ratiu wrote:
>
>> The critical section protected by usbhid->lock in hid_ctrl() is too
>> big and because of this it causes a recursive deadlock. "Too big" means
>> the case statement and the call to hid_input_report() do not need to be
>> protected by the spinlock (no URB operations are done inside them).
>>
>> The deadlock happens because in certain rare cases drivers try to grab
>> the lock while handling the ctrl irq which grabs the lock before them
>> as described above. For example newer wacom tablets like 056a:033c try
>> to reschedule proximity reads from wacom_intuos_schedule_prox_event()
>> calling hid_hw_request() -> usbhid_request() -> usbhid_submit_report()
>> which tries to grab the usbhid lock already held by hid_ctrl().
>>
>> There are two ways to get out of this deadlock:
>>     1. Make the drivers work "around" the ctrl critical region, in the
>>     wacom case for ex. by delaying the scheduling of the proximity read
>>     request itself to a workqueue.
>>     2. Shrink the critical region so the usbhid lock protects only the
>>     instructions which modify usbhid state, calling hid_input_report()
>>     with the spinlock unlocked, allowing the device driver to grab the
>>     lock first, finish and then grab the lock afterwards in hid_ctrl().
>>
>> This patch implements the 2nd solution.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ioan-Adrian Ratiu <adi@adirat.com>
>
> Applied to for-4.5/core branch. Thanks,

Since wacom_intuos_schedule_prox_event() was introduced on March 5,
2015, the call was first used in kernel 3.19. Shouldn't we back-port
this patch to other stable versions?

Thank you.

Ping
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web