Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1280428 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-12-01 01:40 +0100 |
| Last post | 2015-12-01 16:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 03/10] gpio: samsung: move gpio-samsung driver back to platform code Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2015-12-01 01:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 03/10] gpio: samsung: move gpio-samsung driver back to platform code Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-12-01 16:40 +0100
| From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-01 01:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 03/10] gpio: samsung: move gpio-samsung driver back to platform code |
| Message-ID | <qAH97-2nP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 26.11.2015 01:06, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The gpio-samsung driver is special in the sense that it
> interacts directly in multiple ways with the legacy platform
> code for the s3c24xx and s3c64xx platforms. In contrast,
> all devicetree based machines for Samsung, including the
> ones on those two SoC families use a different driver.
>
> The header files that define the interface between the platform
> code and the gpio driver are not visible when building a
> kernel for ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM, which prevents us from
> turning on this option for s3c64xx.
>
> To work around this, we now move the driver back into platform
> code, from where it was originally moved to as part of commit
> 1b39d5f2cc5c28 ("gpio/samsung: gpio-samsung.c to support
> Samsung GPIOs").
>
> The long-term plan for this driver would be to remove it
> entirely, after all Samsung machines have been converted
> over to boot from DT, but there is currently no timeline
> for when that might happen.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig | 3 +++
> arch/arm/plat-samsung/Makefile | 2 ++
> {drivers/gpio => arch/arm/plat-samsung}/gpio-samsung.c | 0
> drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 7 -------
> drivers/gpio/Makefile | 1 -
> 5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> rename {drivers/gpio => arch/arm/plat-samsung}/gpio-samsung.c (100%)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig
> index 57729b915003..83697414bfa0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig
> @@ -294,6 +294,9 @@ config SAMSUNG_WDT_RESET
> Compile support for system restart by triggering watchdog reset.
> Used on SoCs that do not provide dedicated reset control.
>
> +config GPIO_SAMSUNG
> + def_bool SAMSUNG_ATAGS
> +
I think this should be put inside "if SAMSUNG_ATAGS" section, just
before SAMSUNG_PM_GPIO (with default=y?). It makes more consistent with
rest of the options depending on ATAGS.
Rest seems fine:
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-01 16:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 03/10] gpio: samsung: move gpio-samsung driver back to platform code |
| Message-ID | <qAVc7-30Q-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1280428 |
On Tuesday 01 December 2015 09:34:18 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 26.11.2015 01:06, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig > > index 57729b915003..83697414bfa0 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig > > @@ -294,6 +294,9 @@ config SAMSUNG_WDT_RESET > > Compile support for system restart by triggering watchdog reset. > > Used on SoCs that do not provide dedicated reset control. > > > > +config GPIO_SAMSUNG > > + def_bool SAMSUNG_ATAGS > > + > > I think this should be put inside "if SAMSUNG_ATAGS" section, just > before SAMSUNG_PM_GPIO (with default=y?). It makes more consistent with > rest of the options depending on ATAGS. Good idea, changed that now. > Rest seems fine: > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Thanks, Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web