Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1280717 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: enable pinctrl for Broadcom NSP

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: enable pinctrl for Broadcom NSP Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2015-12-01 11:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: enable pinctrl for Broadcom NSP Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com> - 2015-12-01 17:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: enable pinctrl for Broadcom NSP Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com> - 2015-12-01 17:30 +0100

#1280717 — Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: enable pinctrl for Broadcom NSP

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 20/11/15 09:58, Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy wrote:
>> This enables the pinctrl support for Broadcom NSP SoC
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy <yrdreddy@broadcom.com>
>
> Looks like a sane pinctrl node here, unless there are objections, I
> would like to go ahead and apply this for v4.5, thanks!

I'm waiting for an indication from the other BCM pinctrl
maintainers to tell whether this SoC is unique enough to deserve
its own driver.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1280993

Hi Linus,

On 15-12-01 02:00 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 20/11/15 09:58, Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy wrote:
>>> This enables the pinctrl support for Broadcom NSP SoC
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy <yrdreddy@broadcom.com>
>>
>> Looks like a sane pinctrl node here, unless there are objections, I
>> would like to go ahead and apply this for v4.5, thanks!
>
> I'm waiting for an indication from the other BCM pinctrl
> maintainers to tell whether this SoC is unique enough to deserve
> its own driver.
If Stephen Warren is the other maintainer you are talking about he does 
not work at Broadcom.  I don't think he is familiar with the variety of 
pinctrl implementations present.  But yes, the pinctrl implementations 
have been rather unique in these Socs.  As Ray indicated we're trying to 
get the silicon designers to standardize more going forward so we don't 
have to create unique drivers for these SoCs.
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>

Regards,
  Scott

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1281024

On 12/1/2015 8:05 AM, Scott Branden wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> On 15-12-01 02:00 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Florian Fainelli
>> <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 20/11/15 09:58, Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy wrote:
>>>> This enables the pinctrl support for Broadcom NSP SoC
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy
>>>> <yrdreddy@broadcom.com>
>>>
>>> Looks like a sane pinctrl node here, unless there are objections, I
>>> would like to go ahead and apply this for v4.5, thanks!
>>
>> I'm waiting for an indication from the other BCM pinctrl
>> maintainers to tell whether this SoC is unique enough to deserve
>> its own driver.
> If Stephen Warren is the other maintainer you are talking about he does
> not work at Broadcom.  I don't think he is familiar with the variety of
> pinctrl implementations present.  But yes, the pinctrl implementations
> have been rather unique in these Socs.  As Ray indicated we're trying to
> get the silicon designers to standardize more going forward so we don't
> have to create unique drivers for these SoCs.

Yes. Hopefully NSP and NS2 will be the last iProc based SoCs that 
require unique pinmux driver.

>>
>> Yours,
>> Linus Walleij
>>
>
> Regards,
>   Scott
>

Thanks,

Ray
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web