Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1280619 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@suse.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-12-01 08:40 +0100 |
| Last post | 2015-12-01 08:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [RFC] blk-mq and I/O scheduling Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@suse.com> - 2015-12-01 08:40 +0100
| From | Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@suse.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-01 08:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC] blk-mq and I/O scheduling |
| Message-ID | <qANHz-6Cu-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 09:19:32AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi Andreas, Hi Christoph, > I don't understand the time slicing algorithm to well, but from the > blk-mq integration perspective this looks nice, and anything that > helps improving blk-mq for spinning rust is useful. I'll put description/comments in the next patch version that hopefully explain it. > As a nitpick some of the larger "if (use_time_slice)" blocks should > be moved into separate helper functionsâ„ And I'll address this also. Thanks, Andreas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web