Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1227398 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 0/2] x86/msr: MSR access failure changes

Started byAndy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
First post2015-09-17 23:20 +0200
Last post2015-09-17 23:20 +0200
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH 0/2] x86/msr: MSR access failure changes Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2015-09-17 23:20 +0200
    [PATCH 1/2] x86/msr: Carry on after a non-"safe" MSR access fails without !panic_on_oops Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2015-09-17 23:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/msr: Carry on after a non-"safe" MSR access  fails without !panic_on_oops Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-09-18 09:20 +0200
    [PATCH 2/2] x86/msr: Set the return value to zero when native_rdmsr_safe fails Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2015-09-17 23:20 +0200

#1227398 — [PATCH 0/2] x86/msr: MSR access failure changes

FromAndy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Date2015-09-17 23:20 +0200
Subject[PATCH 0/2] x86/msr: MSR access failure changes
Message-ID<q9OKZ-7kB-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
This applies on top of my earlier MSR series.

Andy Lutomirski (2):
  x86/msr: Carry on after a non-"safe" MSR access fails without
    !panic_on_oops
  x86/msr: Set the return value to zero when native_rdmsr_safe fails

 arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h |  5 ++++-
 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c    | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
2.4.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1227399 — [PATCH 1/2] x86/msr: Carry on after a non-"safe" MSR access fails without !panic_on_oops

FromAndy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Date2015-09-17 23:20 +0200
Subject[PATCH 1/2] x86/msr: Carry on after a non-"safe" MSR access fails without !panic_on_oops
Message-ID<q9OKZ-7kB-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1227398
This demotes an OOPS and likely panic due to a failed non-"safe" MSR
access to a WARN_ON_ONCE and a return of poisoned values (in the
RDMSR case).  We still write a pr_info entry unconditionally for
debugging.

To be clear, this type of failure should *not* happen.  This patch
exists to minimize the chance of nasty undebuggable failures due on
systems that used to work due to a now-fixed CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y bug.

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
index 346eec73f7db..b7731765017a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
@@ -437,6 +437,54 @@ exit_trap:
 	do_trap(X86_TRAP_BR, SIGSEGV, "bounds", regs, error_code, NULL);
 }
 
+static bool paper_over_kernel_gpf(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Try to decode the opcode that failed.  So far, we only care
+	 * about boring two-byte unprefixed opcodes, so we don't need
+	 * the full instruction decoder machinery.
+	 */
+	u16 opcode;
+
+	if (probe_kernel_read(&opcode, (const void *)regs->ip, sizeof(opcode)))
+		return false;
+
+	if (opcode == 0x320f) {
+		/* RDMSR */
+		pr_info("bad kernel RDMSR from non-existent MSR 0x%x",
+			(unsigned int)regs->cx);
+		if (!panic_on_oops) {
+			WARN_ON_ONCE(true);
+
+			/* Patch it up with deterministic poison. */
+			regs->ax = 0x5aadc0de;
+			regs->dx = 0x8badf00d;
+			regs->ip += 2;
+			return true;
+		} else {
+			/* Don't fix it up. */
+			return false;
+		}
+	} else if (opcode == 0x300f) {
+		/* WRMSR */
+		pr_info("bad kernel WRMSR writing 0x%08x%08x to MSR 0x%x",
+			(unsigned int)regs->dx, (unsigned int)regs->ax,
+			(unsigned int)regs->cx);
+		if (!panic_on_oops) {
+			WARN_ON_ONCE(true);
+
+			/* Pretend it worked and carry on. */
+			regs->ip += 2;
+			return true;
+		} else {
+			/* Don't fix it up. */
+			return false;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 dotraplinkage void
 do_general_protection(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
 {
@@ -456,6 +504,9 @@ do_general_protection(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
 		if (fixup_exception(regs))
 			return;
 
+		if (paper_over_kernel_gpf(regs))
+			return;
+
 		tsk->thread.error_code = error_code;
 		tsk->thread.trap_nr = X86_TRAP_GP;
 		if (notify_die(DIE_GPF, "general protection fault", regs, error_code,
-- 
2.4.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1227610 — Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/msr: Carry on after a non-"safe" MSR access fails without !panic_on_oops

FromIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Date2015-09-18 09:20 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] x86/msr: Carry on after a non-"safe" MSR access fails without !panic_on_oops
Message-ID<q9Y7D-43h-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1227399
* Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:

> This demotes an OOPS and likely panic due to a failed non-"safe" MSR
> access to a WARN_ON_ONCE and a return of poisoned values (in the
> RDMSR case).  We still write a pr_info entry unconditionally for
> debugging.
> 
> To be clear, this type of failure should *not* happen.  This patch
> exists to minimize the chance of nasty undebuggable failures due on
> systems that used to work due to a now-fixed CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y bug.

> +	if (opcode == 0x320f) {
> +		/* RDMSR */
> +		pr_info("bad kernel RDMSR from non-existent MSR 0x%x",
> +			(unsigned int)regs->cx);
> +		if (!panic_on_oops) {
> +			WARN_ON_ONCE(true);
> +
> +			/* Patch it up with deterministic poison. */
> +			regs->ax = 0x5aadc0de;
> +			regs->dx = 0x8badf00d;
> +			regs->ip += 2;
> +			return true;

IMHO this should really not poison the result, but use zero as the result.

The poison might randomly indicate 'present' feature in various registers that 
might be accessed in a buggy way. Don't send the code further down into la-la-land 
by giving it a 'success'.

And yes, zero can mean success too, but we have to pick a side here ...

The warning will be enough to fix these ups, people (and in particular distro 
testing people) will be watching out for them.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1227405 — [PATCH 2/2] x86/msr: Set the return value to zero when native_rdmsr_safe fails

FromAndy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Date2015-09-17 23:20 +0200
Subject[PATCH 2/2] x86/msr: Set the return value to zero when native_rdmsr_safe fails
Message-ID<q9OL0-7kB-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1227398
This will cause unchecked native_rdmsr_safe failures to return
deterministic results.

We could poison the results with something other than zero, but that
would increase code size.

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
index 77d8b284e4a7..9eda52205d42 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
@@ -73,7 +73,10 @@ static inline unsigned long long native_read_msr_safe(unsigned int msr,
 	asm volatile("2: rdmsr ; xor %[err],%[err]\n"
 		     "1:\n\t"
 		     ".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n\t"
-		     "3:  mov %[fault],%[err] ; jmp 1b\n\t"
+		     "3: mov %[fault],%[err]\n\t"
+		     "xorl %%eax, %%eax\n\t"
+		     "xorl %%edx, %%edx\n\t"
+		     "jmp 1b\n\t"
 		     ".previous\n\t"
 		     _ASM_EXTABLE(2b, 3b)
 		     : [err] "=r" (*err), EAX_EDX_RET(val, low, high)
-- 
2.4.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web