Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1226680 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] [v2] PM / hibernate: Fix hibernation panic caused by inconsistent e820 map

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH] [v2] PM / hibernate: Fix hibernation panic caused by  inconsistent e820 map Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2015-09-17 07:50 +0200

#1226680 — Re: [PATCH] [v2] PM / hibernate: Fix hibernation panic caused by inconsistent e820 map

Hi!

> PM: Image mismatch: memory size
> 
> This is also because BIOS provides different e820 memory map before/after
> hibernation, and linux regards it as invalid process and refuses to
> resume, in order to protect against data corruption. However,
> this check might be too strict, consider the following scenario:

Well... yes, the check is strict, but why is BIOS doing that? Can you
fix it instead?

> The hibernating system has a smaller memory capacity than
> the resuming system, and the former memory region is a subset of the
> latter, it should be allowed to resume. Here is a case for this
> situation:
> 
> before hibernation:
> 
> BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000020200000-0x0000000077517fff] usable
> BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000077518000-0x0000000077567fff] reserved
> Memory: 3871356K/4058428K available (7595K kernel code, 1202K rwdata,
> 3492K rodata, 1400K init, 1308K bss, 187072K reserved, 0K cma-reserved)
> 
> after hibernation:
> BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000020200000-0x000000007753ffff] usable
> BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000077540000-0x0000000077567fff] reserved
> Memory: 3871516K/4058588K available (7595K kernel code, 1202K rwdata,
> 3492K rodata, 1400K init, 1308K bss, 187072K reserved, 0K cma-reserved)
> 
> According to above data, the number of present_pages has increased by
> 40(thus 160K), linux will terminate the resuming process. But since
> [0x0000000020200000-0x0000000077517fff] is a subset of
> [0x0000000020200000-0x000000007753ffff], we should let system
> resume.

Ok, complex, but will work. But what happens in the opposite case? On
the next boot, bios gets you 160K less....

Can you do echo powerdown > /sys/power/disk to work around this?

								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web