Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1220166 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 0/5] New Atmel PIO4 pinctrl/gpio driver

Started byLudovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
First post2015-09-07 15:20 +0200
Last post2015-09-15 11:20 +0200
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 0/5] New Atmel PIO4 pinctrl/gpio driver Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> - 2015-09-07 15:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 0/5] New Atmel PIO4 pinctrl/gpio driver Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> - 2015-09-15 11:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 0/5] New Atmel PIO4 pinctrl/gpio driver Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> - 2015-09-15 11:20 +0200

#1220166 — Re: [PATCH 0/5] New Atmel PIO4 pinctrl/gpio driver

FromLudovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
Date2015-09-07 15:20 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/5] New Atmel PIO4 pinctrl/gpio driver
Message-ID<q64v0-6CG-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi Sascha,

Any comments about this version? Maybe you missed it since you answered
me on the RFC version. Of course I'll do the changes you requested for
the next version (remove gpio_request_*() stuff and add macros for gpio
muxing case).

Thanks

Ludovic

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:28:00AM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The Atmel PIO4 controller has been introduced with SAMA5D2 chip family. This
> drivers manages both pinmux/pinconf and gpio stuff. It is inspired by Mediatek
> pinctrl driver.
> 
> Ludovic Desroches (5):
>   pinctrl: introduce driver for Atmel PIO4 controller
>   pinctrl: dt-binding: Add DT binding documentation for Atmel PIO4
>   MAINTAINERS: Add an entry for pinctrl-at91-pio4
>   ARM: at91/dt: sama5d2: add pio controller node
>   ARM: at91/defconfig: sama5: add PIO4 controller support
> 
>  .../bindings/pinctrl/atmel,at91-pio4-pinctrl.txt   |   90 ++
>  MAINTAINERS                                        |    7 +
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d2.dtsi                     |   14 +
>  arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig                         |    1 +
>  drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig                            |   13 +
>  drivers/pinctrl/Makefile                           |    1 +
>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c                | 1063 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  7 files changed, 1189 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/atmel,at91-pio4-pinctrl.txt
>  create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c
> 
> -- 
> 2.5.0
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1224774

FromSascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Date2015-09-15 11:00 +0200
Message-ID<q8UfL-8i3-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1220166
Hi Ludovic,

On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 03:12:10PM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
> 
> Any comments about this version? Maybe you missed it since you answered
> me on the RFC version. Of course I'll do the changes you requested for
> the next version (remove gpio_request_*() stuff and add macros for gpio
> muxing case).

The binding looks good to me. I wonder where the pinmux defines have
gone, they were part of the last series but not of this one.

Sascha


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1224828

FromLudovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
Date2015-09-15 11:20 +0200
Message-ID<q8Uz8-u1-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1224774
Hi Sascha,

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:57:03AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Hi Ludovic,
> 
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 03:12:10PM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
> > Hi Sascha,
> > 
> > Any comments about this version? Maybe you missed it since you answered
> > me on the RFC version. Of course I'll do the changes you requested for
> > the next version (remove gpio_request_*() stuff and add macros for gpio
> > muxing case).
> 
> The binding looks good to me. I wonder where the pinmux defines have
> gone, they were part of the last series but not of this one.

It was because I planned to send it when I will add pinctrl of all the
devices.

I'll add it for the next version since you agree the bindings.

Regards

Ludovic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web