Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1224396 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 2/5] spi: spi-ti-qspi: add mmap mode read support

Started byMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
First post2015-09-14 20:30 +0200
Last post2015-09-16 12:10 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 2/5] spi: spi-ti-qspi: add mmap mode read support Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-09-14 20:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 2/5] spi: spi-ti-qspi: add mmap mode read support Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com> - 2015-09-16 12:10 +0200

#1224396 — Re: [PATCH 2/5] spi: spi-ti-qspi: add mmap mode read support

FromMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Date2015-09-14 20:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/5] spi: spi-ti-qspi: add mmap mode read support
Message-ID<q8GFQ-5Kz-29@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:59:59PM +0530, Vignesh R wrote:

> +static int ti_qspi_spi_mtd_mmap_read(struct  spi_device *spi,
> +				     loff_t from, size_t len,
> +				     size_t *retlen, u_char *buf,
> +				     u8 read_opcode, u8 addr_width,
> +				     u8 dummy_bytes)
> +{
> +	struct ti_qspi *qspi = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	spi_bus_lock(qspi->master);

I suspect I'm going to see the answer to this in another patch but the
fact that we're having to take this lock in a driver when it's an op the
core should be calling.

> +	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(qspi->dev);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(qspi->dev, "pm_runtime_get_sync() failed\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}

This would be better outside the lock, there's no need to have the lock
before we power on and this fixes the fact that you don't release the
lock here.

> +	memcpy(buf, (__force void *)(qspi->mmap_base + from), len);

The fact that you're having to cast here should be a warning that
there's someting wrong here.  I think you're looking for
memcpy_fromio().

> @@ -479,6 +576,7 @@ static int ti_qspi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	master->setup = ti_qspi_setup;
>  	master->auto_runtime_pm = true;
>  	master->transfer_one_message = ti_qspi_start_transfer_one;
> +	master->spi_mtd_mmap_read = ti_qspi_spi_mtd_mmap_read;
>  	master->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
>  	master->bits_per_word_mask = SPI_BPW_MASK(32) | SPI_BPW_MASK(16) |
>  				     SPI_BPW_MASK(8);

Don't we need to map a resource somewhere?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1225908

FromVignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>
Date2015-09-16 12:10 +0200
Message-ID<q9hP3-1id-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1224396

On 09/14/2015 11:56 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:59:59PM +0530, Vignesh R wrote:
> 
>> +static int ti_qspi_spi_mtd_mmap_read(struct  spi_device *spi,
>> +				     loff_t from, size_t len,
>> +				     size_t *retlen, u_char *buf,
>> +				     u8 read_opcode, u8 addr_width,
>> +				     u8 dummy_bytes)
>> +{
>> +	struct ti_qspi *qspi = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
>> +	int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +	spi_bus_lock(qspi->master);
> 
> I suspect I'm going to see the answer to this in another patch but the
> fact that we're having to take this lock in a driver when it's an op the
> core should be calling.
>

Agree..

>> +	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(qspi->dev);
>> +	if (ret < 0) {
>> +		dev_err(qspi->dev, "pm_runtime_get_sync() failed\n");
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
> 
> This would be better outside the lock, there's no need to have the lock
> before we power on and this fixes the fact that you don't release the
> lock here.

Will take care of this in SPI core API

> 
>> +	memcpy(buf, (__force void *)(qspi->mmap_base + from), len);
> 
> The fact that you're having to cast here should be a warning that
> there's someting wrong here.  I think you're looking for
> memcpy_fromio().

Ok, will change to memcpy_fromio()

> 
>> @@ -479,6 +576,7 @@ static int ti_qspi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  	master->setup = ti_qspi_setup;
>>  	master->auto_runtime_pm = true;
>>  	master->transfer_one_message = ti_qspi_start_transfer_one;
>> +	master->spi_mtd_mmap_read = ti_qspi_spi_mtd_mmap_read;
>>  	master->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
>>  	master->bits_per_word_mask = SPI_BPW_MASK(32) | SPI_BPW_MASK(16) |
>>  				     SPI_BPW_MASK(8);
> 
> Don't we need to map a resource somewhere?
> 

The current driver code already does the resource mapping:

	res_mmap = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev,
			IORESOURCE_MEM, "qspi_mmap");


-- 
Thanks,
Vignesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web