Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1222133 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCHv5 7/7] mm: use 'unsigned int' for compound_dtor/compound_order on 64BIT

Started byVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
First post2015-09-10 13:40 +0200
Last post2015-09-10 13:40 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCHv5 7/7] mm: use 'unsigned int' for  compound_dtor/compound_order on 64BIT Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2015-09-10 13:40 +0200

#1222133 — Re: [PATCHv5 7/7] mm: use 'unsigned int' for compound_dtor/compound_order on 64BIT

FromVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Date2015-09-10 13:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCHv5 7/7] mm: use 'unsigned int' for compound_dtor/compound_order on 64BIT
Message-ID<q78mS-96-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 09/03/2015 02:35 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On 64 bit system we have enough space in struct page to encode
> compound_dtor and compound_order with unsigned int.
> 
> On x86-64 it leads to slightly smaller code size due usesage of plain
> MOV instead of MOVZX (zero-extended move) or similar effect.
> 
> allyesconfig:
> 
>    text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
> 159520446	48146736	72196096	279863278	10ae5fee	vmlinux.pre
> 159520382	48146736	72196096	279863214	10ae5fae	vmlinux.post
> 
> On other architectures without native support of 16-bit data types the
> difference can be bigger.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/mm_types.h | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> index ecaf3b1d0216..39b0db74ba5e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> @@ -150,8 +150,13 @@ struct page {
>  		/* First tail page of compound page */
>  		struct {
>  			unsigned long compound_head; /* If bit zero is set */

I'm indifferent to this change. But some comment here to explain would avoid git
blame to figure out why it's done?

> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> +			unsigned int compound_dtor;
> +			unsigned int compound_order;
> +#else
>  			unsigned short int compound_dtor;
>  			unsigned short int compound_order;
> +#endif
>  		};
>  
>  #if defined(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) && USE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web