Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1221363 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-09 12:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-09-09 20:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] [v2] intel_pstate: Fix user input of min/max to legal policy region Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> - 2015-09-09 12:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] [v2] intel_pstate: Fix user input of min/max to legal policy region Seiichi Ikarashi <s.ikarashi@jp.fujitsu.com> - 2015-09-09 13:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] [v2] intel_pstate: Fix user input of min/max to legal policy region Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com> - 2015-09-09 20:30 +0200
| From | Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-09 12:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH] [v2] intel_pstate: Fix user input of min/max to legal policy region |
| Message-ID | <q6KNB-i6-39@gated-at.bofh.it> |
In current code, max_perf_pct might be smaller than min_perf_pct by improper user input: $ grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/m*_perf_pct /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/max_perf_pct:100 /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/min_perf_pct:100 $ echo 80 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/max_perf_pct $ grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/m*_perf_pct /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/max_perf_pct:80 /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/min_perf_pct:100 Fix this problem by 2 steps: 1.Normalize the user input to [min_policy, max_policy]. 2.Make sure max_perf_pct>=min_perf_pct, suggested by Seiichi Ikarashi. Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> --- v2: - Add logic to ensure max_perf_pct>=min_perf_pct. --- drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 17 ++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c index fcb929e..a0b935f 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c @@ -423,6 +423,8 @@ static ssize_t store_max_perf_pct(struct kobject *a, struct attribute *b, limits.max_sysfs_pct = clamp_t(int, input, 0 , 100); limits.max_perf_pct = min(limits.max_policy_pct, limits.max_sysfs_pct); + limits.max_perf_pct = max(limits.min_policy_pct, limits.max_perf_pct); + limits.max_perf_pct = max(limits.min_perf_pct, limits.max_perf_pct); limits.max_perf = div_fp(int_tofp(limits.max_perf_pct), int_tofp(100)); if (hwp_active) @@ -442,6 +444,8 @@ static ssize_t store_min_perf_pct(struct kobject *a, struct attribute *b, limits.min_sysfs_pct = clamp_t(int, input, 0 , 100); limits.min_perf_pct = max(limits.min_policy_pct, limits.min_sysfs_pct); + limits.min_perf_pct = min(limits.max_policy_pct, limits.min_perf_pct); + limits.min_perf_pct = min(limits.max_perf_pct, limits.min_perf_pct); limits.min_perf = div_fp(int_tofp(limits.min_perf_pct), int_tofp(100)); if (hwp_active) @@ -985,12 +989,19 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) limits.min_policy_pct = (policy->min * 100) / policy->cpuinfo.max_freq; limits.min_policy_pct = clamp_t(int, limits.min_policy_pct, 0 , 100); - limits.min_perf_pct = max(limits.min_policy_pct, limits.min_sysfs_pct); - limits.min_perf = div_fp(int_tofp(limits.min_perf_pct), int_tofp(100)); - limits.max_policy_pct = (policy->max * 100) / policy->cpuinfo.max_freq; limits.max_policy_pct = clamp_t(int, limits.max_policy_pct, 0 , 100); + + /* Normalize user input to [min_policy_pct, max_policy_pct] */ + limits.min_perf_pct = max(limits.min_policy_pct, limits.min_sysfs_pct); + limits.min_perf_pct = min(limits.max_policy_pct, limits.min_perf_pct); limits.max_perf_pct = min(limits.max_policy_pct, limits.max_sysfs_pct); + limits.max_perf_pct = max(limits.min_policy_pct, limits.max_perf_pct); + + /* Make sure min_perf_pct <= max_perf_pct */ + limits.min_perf_pct = min(limits.max_perf_pct, limits.min_perf_pct); + + limits.min_perf = div_fp(int_tofp(limits.min_perf_pct), int_tofp(100)); limits.max_perf = div_fp(int_tofp(limits.max_perf_pct), int_tofp(100)); if (hwp_active) -- 1.8.4.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Seiichi Ikarashi <s.ikarashi@jp.fujitsu.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-09 13:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] [v2] intel_pstate: Fix user input of min/max to legal policy region |
| Message-ID | <q6LzZ-1rQ-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1221363 |
Hi, Yu On 2015-09-09 19:27, Chen Yu wrote: > In current code, max_perf_pct might be smaller than min_perf_pct > by improper user input: > > $ grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/m*_perf_pct > /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/max_perf_pct:100 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/min_perf_pct:100 > > $ echo 80 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/max_perf_pct > > $ grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/m*_perf_pct > /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/max_perf_pct:80 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/min_perf_pct:100 > > Fix this problem by 2 steps: > 1.Normalize the user input to [min_policy, max_policy]. > 2.Make sure max_perf_pct>=min_perf_pct, suggested by Seiichi Ikarashi. > > Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> > --- > v2: > - Add logic to ensure max_perf_pct>=min_perf_pct. > --- > drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 17 ++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > index fcb929e..a0b935f 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > @@ -423,6 +423,8 @@ static ssize_t store_max_perf_pct(struct kobject *a, struct attribute *b, > > limits.max_sysfs_pct = clamp_t(int, input, 0 , 100); > limits.max_perf_pct = min(limits.max_policy_pct, limits.max_sysfs_pct); > + limits.max_perf_pct = max(limits.min_policy_pct, limits.max_perf_pct); > + limits.max_perf_pct = max(limits.min_perf_pct, limits.max_perf_pct); > limits.max_perf = div_fp(int_tofp(limits.max_perf_pct), int_tofp(100)); > > if (hwp_active) > @@ -442,6 +444,8 @@ static ssize_t store_min_perf_pct(struct kobject *a, struct attribute *b, > > limits.min_sysfs_pct = clamp_t(int, input, 0 , 100); > limits.min_perf_pct = max(limits.min_policy_pct, limits.min_sysfs_pct); > + limits.min_perf_pct = min(limits.max_policy_pct, limits.min_perf_pct); > + limits.min_perf_pct = min(limits.max_perf_pct, limits.min_perf_pct); > limits.min_perf = div_fp(int_tofp(limits.min_perf_pct), int_tofp(100)); > > if (hwp_active) > @@ -985,12 +989,19 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > > limits.min_policy_pct = (policy->min * 100) / policy->cpuinfo.max_freq; > limits.min_policy_pct = clamp_t(int, limits.min_policy_pct, 0 , 100); > - limits.min_perf_pct = max(limits.min_policy_pct, limits.min_sysfs_pct); > - limits.min_perf = div_fp(int_tofp(limits.min_perf_pct), int_tofp(100)); > - > limits.max_policy_pct = (policy->max * 100) / policy->cpuinfo.max_freq; > limits.max_policy_pct = clamp_t(int, limits.max_policy_pct, 0 , 100); > + > + /* Normalize user input to [min_policy_pct, max_policy_pct] */ > + limits.min_perf_pct = max(limits.min_policy_pct, limits.min_sysfs_pct); > + limits.min_perf_pct = min(limits.max_policy_pct, limits.min_perf_pct); > limits.max_perf_pct = min(limits.max_policy_pct, limits.max_sysfs_pct); > + limits.max_perf_pct = max(limits.min_policy_pct, limits.max_perf_pct); > + > + /* Make sure min_perf_pct <= max_perf_pct */ > + limits.min_perf_pct = min(limits.max_perf_pct, limits.min_perf_pct); You chose max_perf_pct prior to min_perf_pct here. I agree. > + > + limits.min_perf = div_fp(int_tofp(limits.min_perf_pct), int_tofp(100)); > limits.max_perf = div_fp(int_tofp(limits.max_perf_pct), int_tofp(100)); > > if (hwp_active) > I think this patch is what it should be. Good job. Regards, Seiichi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-09 20:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] [v2] intel_pstate: Fix user input of min/max to legal policy region |
| Message-ID | <q6Si6-2Bs-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1221363 |
On Wed, 9 Sep 2015 18:27:31 +0800 Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> wrote: > In current code, max_perf_pct might be smaller than min_perf_pct > by improper user input: > > $ grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/m*_perf_pct > /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/max_perf_pct:100 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/min_perf_pct:100 > > $ echo 80 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/max_perf_pct > > $ grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/m*_perf_pct > /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/max_perf_pct:80 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/min_perf_pct:100 > > Fix this problem by 2 steps: > 1.Normalize the user input to [min_policy, max_policy]. > 2.Make sure max_perf_pct>=min_perf_pct, suggested by Seiichi Ikarashi. > > Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> Acked-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com> > --- > v2: > - Add logic to ensure max_perf_pct>=min_perf_pct. > --- > drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 17 ++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > index fcb929e..a0b935f 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > @@ -423,6 +423,8 @@ static ssize_t store_max_perf_pct(struct kobject *a, struct attribute *b, > > limits.max_sysfs_pct = clamp_t(int, input, 0 , 100); > limits.max_perf_pct = min(limits.max_policy_pct, limits.max_sysfs_pct); > + limits.max_perf_pct = max(limits.min_policy_pct, limits.max_perf_pct); > + limits.max_perf_pct = max(limits.min_perf_pct, limits.max_perf_pct); > limits.max_perf = div_fp(int_tofp(limits.max_perf_pct), int_tofp(100)); > > if (hwp_active) > @@ -442,6 +444,8 @@ static ssize_t store_min_perf_pct(struct kobject *a, struct attribute *b, > > limits.min_sysfs_pct = clamp_t(int, input, 0 , 100); > limits.min_perf_pct = max(limits.min_policy_pct, limits.min_sysfs_pct); > + limits.min_perf_pct = min(limits.max_policy_pct, limits.min_perf_pct); > + limits.min_perf_pct = min(limits.max_perf_pct, limits.min_perf_pct); > limits.min_perf = div_fp(int_tofp(limits.min_perf_pct), int_tofp(100)); > > if (hwp_active) > @@ -985,12 +989,19 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > > limits.min_policy_pct = (policy->min * 100) / policy->cpuinfo.max_freq; > limits.min_policy_pct = clamp_t(int, limits.min_policy_pct, 0 , 100); > - limits.min_perf_pct = max(limits.min_policy_pct, limits.min_sysfs_pct); > - limits.min_perf = div_fp(int_tofp(limits.min_perf_pct), int_tofp(100)); > - > limits.max_policy_pct = (policy->max * 100) / policy->cpuinfo.max_freq; > limits.max_policy_pct = clamp_t(int, limits.max_policy_pct, 0 , 100); > + > + /* Normalize user input to [min_policy_pct, max_policy_pct] */ > + limits.min_perf_pct = max(limits.min_policy_pct, limits.min_sysfs_pct); > + limits.min_perf_pct = min(limits.max_policy_pct, limits.min_perf_pct); > limits.max_perf_pct = min(limits.max_policy_pct, limits.max_sysfs_pct); > + limits.max_perf_pct = max(limits.min_policy_pct, limits.max_perf_pct); > + > + /* Make sure min_perf_pct <= max_perf_pct */ > + limits.min_perf_pct = min(limits.max_perf_pct, limits.min_perf_pct); > + > + limits.min_perf = div_fp(int_tofp(limits.min_perf_pct), int_tofp(100)); > limits.max_perf = div_fp(int_tofp(limits.max_perf_pct), int_tofp(100)); > > if (hwp_active) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web