Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1216133 > unrolled thread

ARCv2 testing exposure (Re: arc build failures in -next due to ARCv2 patch)

Started byVineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
First post2015-08-31 12:40 +0200
Last post2015-08-31 16:00 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  ARCv2 testing exposure (Re: arc build failures in -next due to  ARCv2 patch) Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2015-08-31 12:40 +0200
    Re: ARCv2 testing exposure (Re: arc build failures in -next due to  ARCv2 patch) Guenter Roeck <private@roeck-us.net> - 2015-08-31 16:00 +0200

#1216133 — ARCv2 testing exposure (Re: arc build failures in -next due to ARCv2 patch)

FromVineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
Date2015-08-31 12:40 +0200
SubjectARCv2 testing exposure (Re: arc build failures in -next due to ARCv2 patch)
Message-ID<q3uFk-56g-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi Guenter,

On Sunday 28 June 2015 08:46 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Saturday 27 June 2015 07:46 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:

>>> >> Thx for reporting the issue - I have pushed a fix (also attached) which shd cure
>>> >> it (don't have exactly similar oldish gcc at hand).
>> > 
>> > Not that old, really, it just isn't configured for ARCv2. Question is if I need two
>> > separate compilers or if I can configure it to support both v1 and v2.
>
> The compiler itself can support both - however issue is multilib'ing / libgcc. The
> elf32 compiler is multilib'ed - but we've been using the uclibc compiler (with
> just the right toggles) to build the kernel as well (to avoid having to use 2
> toolchains for kernel / user etc).
> 
> long story short - ATM, we need 2 different compilers to build legacy ARCompact,
> and newer ARCv2.

I was wondering about ARCv2 coverage in your build service. Do you have the needed
2nd toolchain for ARCv2 as well. If not can u add it please.

To build one, you could use upstream buildroot or the legacy scripts at

git@github.com:foss-for-synopsys-dwc-arc-processors/toolchain.git

Or if you so prefer, we also have prebuilt toolchains in github releases.

Thx,
-Vineet
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1216196

FromGuenter Roeck <private@roeck-us.net>
Date2015-08-31 16:00 +0200
Message-ID<q3xMS-13i-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1216133
Hi Vineet,

On 08/31/2015 03:35 AM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> I was wondering about ARCv2 coverage in your build service. Do you have the needed 2nd toolchain for ARCv2 as well. If not can u add it please. To build one, you could use upstream buildroot or the legacy scripts at git@github.com:foss-for-synopsys-dwc-arc-processors/toolchain.git Or if you so prefer, we also have prebuilt toolchains in github releases. Thx, -Vineet 

Thanks for the information.

I created a toolchain using buildroot, and the build service already covers arcv2.

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web