Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1211905 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-24 10:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-08-26 11:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Build regressions/improvements in v4.2-rc8 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2015-08-24 10:40 +0200
Re: Build regressions/improvements in v4.2-rc8 Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> - 2015-08-26 11:10 +0200
| From | Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 10:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Build regressions/improvements in v4.2-rc8 |
| Message-ID | <q0Vsl-2pv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> JFYI, when comparing v4.2-rc8[1] to v4.2-rc7[3], the summaries are:
> - build errors: +4/-7
4 regressions:
+ /home/kisskb/slave/src/include/linux/kvm_host.h: error: array
subscript is above array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds]: => 430:19
(arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu.c: In function 'kvmppc_mmu
_book3s_64_tlbie':)
powerpc-randconfig (seen before in a v3.15-rc1 build?)
+ error: initramfs.c: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_guard':
=> .init.text+0x1cb0)
(init/built-in.o: In function `parse_header':)
x86_64-randconfig
+ error: pci.c: undefined reference to `pci_ioremap_io': => .init.text+0x3c4)
(arch/arm/mach-versatile/built-in.o: In function `pci_versatile_setup')
arm-randconfig
> [1] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/9289/ (253 out of 254 configs)
> [3] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/9260/ (253 out of 254 configs)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 11:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q1ESu-1fe-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1211905 |
On 24.08.15 10:36, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> JFYI, when comparing v4.2-rc8[1] to v4.2-rc7[3], the summaries are:
>> - build errors: +4/-7
>
> 4 regressions:
> + /home/kisskb/slave/src/include/linux/kvm_host.h: error: array
> subscript is above array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds]: => 430:19
> (arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu.c: In function 'kvmppc_mmu
> _book3s_64_tlbie':)
>
> powerpc-randconfig (seen before in a v3.15-rc1 build?)
I'm not quite sure what's going wrong here. The code in question does
kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, v, vcpu->kvm)
kvmppc_mmu_pte_vflush(v, va >> 12, mask);
and IIUC the thing we're potentially running over on would be
kvm->vcpus[i]. But that one is bound by the kvm_for_each_vcpu loop, no?
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web