Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1210097 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: temperature: add max6675 thermocouple converter driver

Started byMatt Porter <mporter@konsulko.com>
First post2015-08-20 02:30 +0200
Last post2015-08-23 17:50 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: temperature: add max6675 thermocouple converter  driver Matt Porter <mporter@konsulko.com> - 2015-08-20 02:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: temperature: add max6675 thermocouple converter  driver Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> - 2015-08-23 17:50 +0200

#1210097 — Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: temperature: add max6675 thermocouple converter driver

FromMatt Porter <mporter@konsulko.com>
Date2015-08-20 02:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] iio: temperature: add max6675 thermocouple converter driver
Message-ID<pZlTY-5bn-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 12:39:40PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 06/08/15 18:38, Matt Porter wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 11:26:12PM +0200, Peter Meerwald wrote:
> >> On Mon, 3 Aug 2015, Matt Porter wrote:
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> >>> +static int max6675_read(struct max6675_state *st, int *val)
> >>> +{
> >>> +	int ret;
> >>> +
> >>> +	ret = spi_read(st->spi, val, 2);
> >>> +	if (ret < 0)
> >>> +		return ret;
> >>> +
> >>> +	/* Temperature is bits 14..3 */
> >>> +	*val = (*val >> 3) & 0xfff;
> >>
> >> what about endianness conversion?
> >> use be16_to_cpu()
> > 
> > Apologies, I spoke before engaging the brain on my first reply to this
> > As specified by the SPI subsystem docs, SPI buffers are always stored
> > in native endian order. There is no need for endianness conversion here.
> First of all, which doc say this?
> Secondly how does SPI know the endianness of the sensor which is what
> actually matters here?  I2C can in theory make these guarantees as there
> is an expected byte order on the wire (even if quite a few drivers don't
> conform to the spec anyway). No such guarantee can exist for SPI.

include/linux/spi/spi.h:

 * In-memory data values are always in native CPU byte order, translated
 * from the wire byte order (big-endian except with SPI_LSB_FIRST).  So
 * for example when bits_per_word is sixteen, buffers are 2N bytes long
 * (@len = 2N) and hold N sixteen bit words in CPU byte order.

So, as you mention, there's no standardized byte order but it's
controlled with the per transfer flag and big endian by default.

-Matt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1211641

FromJonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Date2015-08-23 17:50 +0200
Message-ID<q0FGV-54n-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1210097
On 20/08/15 01:23, Matt Porter wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 12:39:40PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On 06/08/15 18:38, Matt Porter wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 11:26:12PM +0200, Peter Meerwald wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 3 Aug 2015, Matt Porter wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>>> +static int max6675_read(struct max6675_state *st, int *val)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +	int ret;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	ret = spi_read(st->spi, val, 2);
>>>>> +	if (ret < 0)
>>>>> +		return ret;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	/* Temperature is bits 14..3 */
>>>>> +	*val = (*val >> 3) & 0xfff;
>>>>
>>>> what about endianness conversion?
>>>> use be16_to_cpu()
>>>
>>> Apologies, I spoke before engaging the brain on my first reply to this
>>> As specified by the SPI subsystem docs, SPI buffers are always stored
>>> in native endian order. There is no need for endianness conversion here.
>> First of all, which doc say this?
>> Secondly how does SPI know the endianness of the sensor which is what
>> actually matters here?  I2C can in theory make these guarantees as there
>> is an expected byte order on the wire (even if quite a few drivers don't
>> conform to the spec anyway). No such guarantee can exist for SPI.
> 
> include/linux/spi/spi.h:
> 
>  * In-memory data values are always in native CPU byte order, translated
>  * from the wire byte order (big-endian except with SPI_LSB_FIRST).  So
>  * for example when bits_per_word is sixteen, buffers are 2N bytes long
>  * (@len = 2N) and hold N sixteen bit words in CPU byte order.
> 
> So, as you mention, there's no standardized byte order but it's
> controlled with the per transfer flag and big endian by default.
> 
Thanks, I'd never picked up on that before!

Jonathan
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web