Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1161100 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-06-09 09:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-06-09 09:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [RFC PATCH 09/18] kthread: Make it easier to correctly sleep in iterant kthreads Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2015-06-09 09:40 +0200
| From | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-09 09:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 09/18] kthread: Make it easier to correctly sleep in iterant kthreads |
| Message-ID | <pzmiD-8eu-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hello, On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 12:01:07PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > BTW: What is the preferred way of freezing, please? Is it better > to end up in the fridge or is it fine to call freezer_do_not_count(); > or set PF_NOFREEZE when it is safe? There's no one good answer. The closest would be "don't use freezer on kthreads". As Peter said, exit points are always safe freezing points and it's generally a good idea to avoid adding one anywhere else. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web