Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1160433 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 00/11] ARM64 PCI hostbridge init based on ACPI

Started byJagan Teki <jteki@openedev.com>
First post2015-06-08 14:10 +0200
Last post2015-06-10 04:50 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 00/11] ARM64 PCI hostbridge init based on ACPI Jagan Teki <jteki@openedev.com> - 2015-06-08 14:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 00/11] ARM64 PCI hostbridge init based on ACPI Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> - 2015-06-10 04:50 +0200

#1160433 — Re: [PATCH 00/11] ARM64 PCI hostbridge init based on ACPI

FromJagan Teki <jteki@openedev.com>
Date2015-06-08 14:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/11] ARM64 PCI hostbridge init based on ACPI
Message-ID<pz42n-6vb-35@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 27 May 2015 at 09:27, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 2015年05月27日 08:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 08:49:13 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>>
>>> This patch set is introducing ARM64 PCI hostbridge init based on ACPI,
>>> which based on Jiang Liu's patch set "Consolidate ACPI PCI root common
>>> code into ACPI core":
>>>
>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/14/98
>>
>>
>> I'll be regarding this patchset as an RFC until the one from Jiang Liu
>> goes in.
>
>
> Yes, please, Jiang Liu's patch set should go in first.

Apart from picking all, I have skipped x86, ia64 changes from above
and Jiang Liu's
series with disabling MSI, but I'm observing my arm64 board isn't
booted from uefi.

I'm suspecting pci-acpi changes were generic to specific pcie root
bridge controller,
but do I need to do any changes wrt pcie bridge? let me know if I miss
anything here.

thanks!
-- 
Jagan.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1161919

FromHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Date2015-06-10 04:50 +0200
Message-ID<pzEfw-10X-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1160433
Hi Jagan,

On 06/08/2015 08:05 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On 27 May 2015 at 09:27, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 2015年05月27日 08:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 08:49:13 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This patch set is introducing ARM64 PCI hostbridge init based on ACPI,
>>>> which based on Jiang Liu's patch set "Consolidate ACPI PCI root common
>>>> code into ACPI core":
>>>>
>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/14/98
>>>
>>>
>>> I'll be regarding this patchset as an RFC until the one from Jiang Liu
>>> goes in.
>>
>>
>> Yes, please, Jiang Liu's patch set should go in first.
>
> Apart from picking all, I have skipped x86, ia64 changes from above
> and Jiang Liu's
> series with disabling MSI, but I'm observing my arm64 board isn't
> booted from uefi.

Do you boot with ACPI? There is no support for ACPI PCI for ARM64
in mainline, which kernel do you use?

>
> I'm suspecting pci-acpi changes were generic to specific pcie root
> bridge controller,
> but do I need to do any changes wrt pcie bridge? let me know if I miss
> anything here.

ARM64 need special handling for IO port resources based on Jiang's patch
set, we still working on it.

Thanks
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web