Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1157792 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-06-03 17:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-06-04 01:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] mm: kmemleak: Fix crashing during kmemleak disabling Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2015-06-03 17:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm: kmemleak: Fix crashing during kmemleak disabling Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-06-04 01:30 +0200
| From | Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-03 17:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH] mm: kmemleak: Fix crashing during kmemleak disabling |
| Message-ID | <pxj5x-5s8-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
With the current implementation, if kmemleak is disabled because of an
error condition (e.g. fails to allocate metadata), alloc/free calls are
no longer tracked. Usually this is not a problem since the kmemleak
metadata is being removed via kmemleak_do_cleanup(). However, if the
scanning thread is running at the time of disabling, kmemleak would no
longer notice a potential vfree() call and the freed/unmapped object may
still be accessed, causing a fault.
This patch separates the kmemleak_free() enabling/disabling from the
overall kmemleak_enabled nob so that we can defer the disabling of the
object freeing tracking until the scanning thread completed. The
kmemleak_free_part() is deliberately ignored by this patch since this is
only called during boot before the scanning thread started.
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reported-by: Vignesh Radhakrishnan <vigneshr@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: Vignesh Radhakrishnan <vigneshr@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
---
mm/kmemleak.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c
index f0fe4f2c1fa7..11d6f8015896 100644
--- a/mm/kmemleak.c
+++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
@@ -195,6 +195,8 @@ static struct kmem_cache *scan_area_cache;
/* set if tracing memory operations is enabled */
static int kmemleak_enabled;
+/* same as above but only for the kmemleak_free() callback */
+static int kmemleak_free_enabled;
/* set in the late_initcall if there were no errors */
static int kmemleak_initialized;
/* enables or disables early logging of the memory operations */
@@ -942,7 +944,7 @@ void __ref kmemleak_free(const void *ptr)
{
pr_debug("%s(0x%p)\n", __func__, ptr);
- if (kmemleak_enabled && ptr && !IS_ERR(ptr))
+ if (kmemleak_free_enabled && ptr && !IS_ERR(ptr))
delete_object_full((unsigned long)ptr);
else if (kmemleak_early_log)
log_early(KMEMLEAK_FREE, ptr, 0, 0);
@@ -982,7 +984,7 @@ void __ref kmemleak_free_percpu(const void __percpu *ptr)
pr_debug("%s(0x%p)\n", __func__, ptr);
- if (kmemleak_enabled && ptr && !IS_ERR(ptr))
+ if (kmemleak_free_enabled && ptr && !IS_ERR(ptr))
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
delete_object_full((unsigned long)per_cpu_ptr(ptr,
cpu));
@@ -1750,6 +1752,12 @@ static void kmemleak_do_cleanup(struct work_struct *work)
mutex_lock(&scan_mutex);
stop_scan_thread();
+ /*
+ * Once the scan thread has stopped, it is safe to no longer track
+ * object freeing.
+ */
+ kmemleak_free_enabled = 0;
+
if (!kmemleak_found_leaks)
__kmemleak_do_cleanup();
else
@@ -1776,6 +1784,8 @@ static void kmemleak_disable(void)
/* check whether it is too early for a kernel thread */
if (kmemleak_initialized)
schedule_work(&cleanup_work);
+ else
+ kmemleak_free_enabled = 0;
pr_info("Kernel memory leak detector disabled\n");
}
@@ -1840,8 +1850,10 @@ void __init kmemleak_init(void)
if (kmemleak_error) {
local_irq_restore(flags);
return;
- } else
+ } else {
kmemleak_enabled = 1;
+ kmemleak_free_enabled = 1;
+ }
local_irq_restore(flags);
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-04 01:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pxqgG-7GP-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1157792 |
On Wed, 3 Jun 2015 16:42:56 +0100 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote: > With the current implementation, if kmemleak is disabled because of an > error condition (e.g. fails to allocate metadata), alloc/free calls are > no longer tracked. Usually this is not a problem since the kmemleak > metadata is being removed via kmemleak_do_cleanup(). However, if the > scanning thread is running at the time of disabling, kmemleak would no > longer notice a potential vfree() call and the freed/unmapped object may > still be accessed, causing a fault. > > This patch separates the kmemleak_free() enabling/disabling from the > overall kmemleak_enabled nob so that we can defer the disabling of the > object freeing tracking until the scanning thread completed. The > kmemleak_free_part() is deliberately ignored by this patch since this is > only called during boot before the scanning thread started. I'm having trouble with this. afacit, kmemleak_free() can still be called while kmemleak_scan() is running on another CPU. kmemleak_free_enabled hasn't been cleared yet so the races remain. However your statement "if the scanning thread is running at the time of disabling" implies that the race is between kmemleak_scan() and kmemleak_disable(). Yet the race avoidance code is placed in kmemleak_free(). All confused. A more detailed description of the race would help. Also, the words "kmemleak would no longer notice a potential vfree() call" aren't sufficiently specific. kmemleak is a big place - what *part* of kmemleak are you referring to here? Finally, I'm concerned that a bare kmemleak_free_enabled = 0; lacks sufficient synchronization with respect to the kmemleak_free_enabled readers from a locking/reordering point of view. What's the story here? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web