Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1157125 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] simplify block layer based on immutable biovecs

Started byChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
First post2015-06-03 09:00 +0200
Last post2015-06-03 19:20 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] simplify block layer based on immutable  biovecs Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2015-06-03 09:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] simplify block layer based on immutable biovecs Ming Lin <mlin@kernel.org> - 2015-06-03 19:20 +0200

#1157125 — Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] simplify block layer based on immutable biovecs

FromChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date2015-06-03 09:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 00/11] simplify block layer based on immutable biovecs
Message-ID<pxaOB-1jN-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 11:15:09PM -0700, Ming Lin wrote:
> > Except for that these changes looks good, and the previous version
> > passed my tests fine, so with some benchmarks you'ĺl have my ACK.
> 
> Can I have your ACK with these numbers?
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/1/38

Looks good to me.  Still like to see consensus from the DM folks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1157910 — Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] simplify block layer based on immutable biovecs

FromMing Lin <mlin@kernel.org>
Date2015-06-03 19:20 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 00/11] simplify block layer based on immutable biovecs
Message-ID<pxkuE-7Ey-55@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1157125
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> writes:
>
>> On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 11:15:09PM -0700, Ming Lin wrote:
>>> > Except for that these changes looks good, and the previous version
>>> > passed my tests fine, so with some benchmarks you'ĺl have my ACK.
>>>
>>> Can I have your ACK with these numbers?
>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/1/38
>>
>> Looks good to me.  Still like to see consensus from the DM folks.
>
> Ming, did you look into the increased stack usage reported by Huang
> Ying?

Yes, I'll reply to Ying's email.

>
> -Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web