Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1210587 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-20 17:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-08-20 17:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH RFC RFT 3/3] clk: introduce CLK_ENABLE_HAND_OFF flag Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2015-08-20 17:20 +0200
| From | Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-20 17:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC RFT 3/3] clk: introduce CLK_ENABLE_HAND_OFF flag |
| Message-ID | <pZzNg-fs-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 09:33:56AM -0700, Michael Turquette wrote: > Quoting Maxime Ripard (2015-08-18 08:52:03) > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:58:27AM -0700, Michael Turquette wrote: > > > For example the whole big messy fuss over the DT bindings for the > > > simple-fb driver could have been avoided if this feature had existed > > > then. > > > > Not really, there was additional issues that would have prevented to > > use that in simplefb too. For example the fact that you wouldn't care > > about the clock at all if simplefb was not enabled in the kernel. Or > > that you would like to protect the pixel clock (or its parent) from > > having its rate changed. > > You're right, there may be more issues involved here. But as I recall > there was interest in using simplefb to "hand-off" to a loadable module > later on, and that was really what I was referring to. > > In that case we could "skip" simplefb having to claim and enable clocks. > The loadable module that is the "rich" driver could just claim them as > usual and the reference counts would be handed over at that time. Yep, but the issue would be broader but just the clocks, but yeah, you're right :) > But I don't mean to dig up past flamebait ;-) Yep, it's probably better not to :) Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web