Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1210646 > unrolled thread

linux-next conflict resolution branch for btrfs

Started byChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
First post2015-08-20 19:40 +0200
Last post2015-08-21 20:10 +0200
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  linux-next conflict resolution branch for btrfs Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> - 2015-08-20 19:40 +0200
    Re: linux-next conflict resolution branch for btrfs Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2015-08-21 02:50 +0200
      Re: linux-next conflict resolution branch for btrfs Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> - 2015-08-21 17:30 +0200
      Re: linux-next conflict resolution branch for btrfs Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> - 2015-08-21 20:10 +0200

#1210646 — linux-next conflict resolution branch for btrfs

FromChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Date2015-08-20 19:40 +0200
Subjectlinux-next conflict resolution branch for btrfs
Message-ID<pZBYK-3iA-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi Stephen,

There are a few conflicts for btrfs in linux-next this time.  They are
small, but I pushed out the merge commit I'm using here:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git next-merge

-chris

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1210814

FromStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date2015-08-21 02:50 +0200
Message-ID<pZIGS-4zi-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1210646
Hi Chris,

On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 13:39:18 -0400 Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> wrote:
>
> There are a few conflicts for btrfs in linux-next this time.  They are
> small, but I pushed out the merge commit I'm using here:
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git next-merge

Thanks for that.  It seems to have merged OK but maybe it conflicts
with something later in linux-next.  Unfortunately see my other email
about a build problem.  I will keep this example merge in mind for
later.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1211215

FromChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Date2015-08-21 17:30 +0200
Message-ID<pZWqu-7Av-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1210814
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:45:24AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> 
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 13:39:18 -0400 Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> wrote:
> >
> > There are a few conflicts for btrfs in linux-next this time.  They are
> > small, but I pushed out the merge commit I'm using here:
> > 
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git next-merge
> 
> Thanks for that.  It seems to have merged OK but maybe it conflicts
> with something later in linux-next.  Unfortunately see my other email
> about a build problem.  I will keep this example merge in mind for
> later.

Ok, sorry about that one.  We probably want the ifdefs up in Tejun's
code, but I'll talk with him about it today and get it fixed up.

Thanks,
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1211284

FromChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Date2015-08-21 20:10 +0200
Message-ID<pZYVj-2PK-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1210814
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:45:24AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> 
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 13:39:18 -0400 Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> wrote:
> >
> > There are a few conflicts for btrfs in linux-next this time.  They are
> > small, but I pushed out the merge commit I'm using here:
> > 
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git next-merge
> 
> Thanks for that.  It seems to have merged OK but maybe it conflicts
> with something later in linux-next.  Unfortunately see my other email
> about a build problem.  I will keep this example merge in mind for
> later.

Ok, I put the ifdefs in btrfs.  Really what I need to do is change
bio_clone to do this work, but that means making sure its the right
thing for dm/md first.

I also added ifdefs for bio->bi_ioc in fs/btrfs/volumes.c, but
another commit in linux-next actually deletes the whole function from
btrfs.  I've redone the example merge:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git next-merge

-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web