Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1208304 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] net/wireless: enable wiphy device to suspend/resume asynchronously

Started by"Fu, Zhonghui" <zhonghui.fu@linux.intel.com>
First post2015-08-17 03:50 +0200
Last post2015-08-17 10:50 +0200
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH] net/wireless: enable wiphy device to suspend/resume asynchronously "Fu, Zhonghui" <zhonghui.fu@linux.intel.com> - 2015-08-17 03:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] net/wireless: enable wiphy device to suspend/resume  asynchronously Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> - 2015-08-17 09:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] net/wireless: enable wiphy device to suspend/resume asynchronously Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com> - 2015-08-17 10:50 +0200

#1208304 — Re: [PATCH] net/wireless: enable wiphy device to suspend/resume asynchronously

From"Fu, Zhonghui" <zhonghui.fu@linux.intel.com>
Date2015-08-17 03:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] net/wireless: enable wiphy device to suspend/resume asynchronously
Message-ID<pYhIJ-YX-11@gated-at.bofh.it>

On 2015/7/30 13:55, Emmanuel Grumbach wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Fu, Zhonghui
> <zhonghui.fu@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> Enable wiphy device to suspend/resume asynchronously. This can improve
>> system suspend/resume speed.
>>
> How will that impact the timing with respect to the suspend call
> coming from the bus?
> I think that a few drivers rely on the suspend call of the wiphy
> device happening before the suspend call to the bus device.
> Not sure though.

Sorry for late reply.

The suspend/resume timing of wiphy device and related devices will be ensured by their parent/child relationship. So, enabling wiphy device to suspend/resume asynchronously does not change any  dependency. It can only take advantage of multicore and improve system suspend/resume speed.


Thanks,
Zhonghui
>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhonghui Fu <zhonghui.fu@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>  net/wireless/core.c |    1 +
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/wireless/core.c b/net/wireless/core.c
>> index 2a0bbd2..bc5e68f 100644
>> --- a/net/wireless/core.c
>> +++ b/net/wireless/core.c
>> @@ -416,6 +416,7 @@ use_default_name:
>>         device_initialize(&rdev->wiphy.dev);
>>         rdev->wiphy.dev.class = &ieee80211_class;
>>         rdev->wiphy.dev.platform_data = rdev;
>> +       device_enable_async_suspend(&rdev->wiphy.dev);
>>
>>         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rdev->destroy_list);
>>         spin_lock_init(&rdev->destroy_list_lock);
>> -- 1.7.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1208425 — Re: [PATCH] net/wireless: enable wiphy device to suspend/resume asynchronously

FromJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date2015-08-17 09:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] net/wireless: enable wiphy device to suspend/resume asynchronously
Message-ID<pYn1L-tt-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1208304
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 09:48 +0800, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
> 
> The suspend/resume timing of wiphy device and related devices will be 
> ensured by their parent/child relationship. So, enabling wiphy device 
> to suspend/resume asynchronously does not change any  dependency. It 
> can only take advantage of multicore and improve system 
> suspend/resume speed.
> 

You're going to have to explain that to me, because I don't see that.
All I see is that when looking at a device, if async is possible, it
gets added to an async work, and if async is not possible then it gets
done immediately. Even putting aside the question of whether or not
async is ordered or not (I don't know), if the wiphy is async and the
PCI (or other bus) device isn't, then it seems they could get handled
out of order, no? Or is there some magic code somewhere that I'm
missing that explicitly waits for the async of the parent/child
relationship?

johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1208475

FromArend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Date2015-08-17 10:50 +0200
Message-ID<pYohd-2c4-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1208425
+ Rafael

On 08/17/2015 09:29 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 09:48 +0800, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
>>
>> The suspend/resume timing of wiphy device and related devices will be
>> ensured by their parent/child relationship. So, enabling wiphy device
>> to suspend/resume asynchronously does not change any  dependency. It
>> can only take advantage of multicore and improve system
>> suspend/resume speed.
>>
>
> You're going to have to explain that to me, because I don't see that.
> All I see is that when looking at a device, if async is possible, it
> gets added to an async work, and if async is not possible then it gets
> done immediately. Even putting aside the question of whether or not
> async is ordered or not (I don't know), if the wiphy is async and the
> PCI (or other bus) device isn't, then it seems they could get handled
> out of order, no? Or is there some magic code somewhere that I'm
> missing that explicitly waits for the async of the parent/child
> relationship?

This patch got me worried as well. Can't find the magic either. Maybe 
Rafael can give some hints here.

Regards,
Arend

> johannes
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web