Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1209279 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-18 16:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-08-18 18:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH 2/2] hrtimer: Unconfuse a bit switch_hrtimer_base Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 16:20 +0200
[tip:timers/core] hrtimer: Unconfuse switch_hrtimer_base() a bit tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2015-08-18 18:50 +0200
| From | Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 16:20 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 2/2] hrtimer: Unconfuse a bit switch_hrtimer_base |
| Message-ID | <pYPU5-fd-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
The variable called "this_base" is confusing because its name suggests
it's of "struct hrtimer_clock_base" type, along with "base" and "new_base"
which doesn't help understanding this complicated function.
Make its name clearer and fix the misleading comments while at it.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
---
kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
index f9eb21b..1828ed0 100644
--- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
@@ -196,18 +196,20 @@ struct hrtimer_cpu_base *get_target_base(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *base,
#endif
/*
- * Switch the timer base to the current CPU when possible.
+ * Switch the timer base to a power-optimized selected CPU target.
+ * If that would involve clock reprogramming, which we can't do on a remote
+ * target, just switch to the current CPU.
*/
static inline struct hrtimer_clock_base *
switch_hrtimer_base(struct hrtimer *timer, struct hrtimer_clock_base *base,
int pinned)
{
- struct hrtimer_cpu_base *new_cpu_base, *this_base;
+ struct hrtimer_cpu_base *new_cpu_base, *this_cpu_base;
struct hrtimer_clock_base *new_base;
int basenum = base->index;
- this_base = this_cpu_ptr(&hrtimer_bases);
- new_cpu_base = get_target_base(this_base, pinned);
+ this_cpu_base = this_cpu_ptr(&hrtimer_bases);
+ new_cpu_base = get_target_base(this_cpu_base, pinned);
again:
new_base = &new_cpu_base->clock_base[basenum];
@@ -229,19 +231,19 @@ again:
raw_spin_unlock(&base->cpu_base->lock);
raw_spin_lock(&new_base->cpu_base->lock);
- if (new_cpu_base != this_base &&
+ if (new_cpu_base != this_cpu_base &&
hrtimer_check_target(timer, new_base)) {
raw_spin_unlock(&new_base->cpu_base->lock);
raw_spin_lock(&base->cpu_base->lock);
- new_cpu_base = this_base;
+ new_cpu_base = this_cpu_base;
timer->base = base;
goto again;
}
timer->base = new_base;
} else {
- if (new_cpu_base != this_base &&
+ if (new_cpu_base != this_cpu_base &&
hrtimer_check_target(timer, new_base)) {
- new_cpu_base = this_base;
+ new_cpu_base = this_cpu_base;
goto again;
}
}
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker <tipbot@zytor.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 18:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [tip:timers/core] hrtimer: Unconfuse switch_hrtimer_base() a bit |
| Message-ID | <pYSfh-3x6-41@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1209279 |
Commit-ID: b48362d8aaf32aeb4a75f5c556c652ffeeb1be5d
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/b48362d8aaf32aeb4a75f5c556c652ffeeb1be5d
Author: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 16:18:29 +0200
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 18:36:59 +0200
hrtimer: Unconfuse switch_hrtimer_base() a bit
The variable called "this_base" is confusing because its name suggests
it's of "struct hrtimer_clock_base" type, along with "base" and "new_base"
which doesn't help understanding this complicated function.
Make its name clearer and fix the misleading comment while at it.
[ tglx: Fixed the comment for real ]
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1439907509-9553-3-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
index f9eb21b..5c4fe50 100644
--- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
@@ -196,18 +196,27 @@ struct hrtimer_cpu_base *get_target_base(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *base,
#endif
/*
- * Switch the timer base to the current CPU when possible.
+ * We switch the timer base to a power-optimized selected CPU target,
+ * if:
+ * - NO_HZ_COMMON is enabled
+ * - timer migration is enabled
+ * - the timer callback is not running
+ * - the timer is not the first expiring timer on the new target
+ *
+ * If one of the above requirements is not fulfilled we move the timer
+ * to the current CPU or leave it on the previously assigned CPU if
+ * the timer callback is currently running.
*/
static inline struct hrtimer_clock_base *
switch_hrtimer_base(struct hrtimer *timer, struct hrtimer_clock_base *base,
int pinned)
{
- struct hrtimer_cpu_base *new_cpu_base, *this_base;
+ struct hrtimer_cpu_base *new_cpu_base, *this_cpu_base;
struct hrtimer_clock_base *new_base;
int basenum = base->index;
- this_base = this_cpu_ptr(&hrtimer_bases);
- new_cpu_base = get_target_base(this_base, pinned);
+ this_cpu_base = this_cpu_ptr(&hrtimer_bases);
+ new_cpu_base = get_target_base(this_cpu_base, pinned);
again:
new_base = &new_cpu_base->clock_base[basenum];
@@ -229,19 +238,19 @@ again:
raw_spin_unlock(&base->cpu_base->lock);
raw_spin_lock(&new_base->cpu_base->lock);
- if (new_cpu_base != this_base &&
+ if (new_cpu_base != this_cpu_base &&
hrtimer_check_target(timer, new_base)) {
raw_spin_unlock(&new_base->cpu_base->lock);
raw_spin_lock(&base->cpu_base->lock);
- new_cpu_base = this_base;
+ new_cpu_base = this_cpu_base;
timer->base = base;
goto again;
}
timer->base = new_base;
} else {
- if (new_cpu_base != this_base &&
+ if (new_cpu_base != this_cpu_base &&
hrtimer_check_target(timer, new_base)) {
- new_cpu_base = this_base;
+ new_cpu_base = this_cpu_base;
goto again;
}
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web